Vicki, I'd debate whether the DSM is the be all and end all for defining disease. Every new edition comes with a raging debate about what should and shouldn't be included.
I personally think the answer to the question originally asked is: Don't get hung up on semantics. Addiction fits nicely into the disease model, so it's logical to call it one.
If you're not using and haven't in some time, like Vicki said, there's no need to wake up feeling like you're sick or diseased.
If you've ever had chicken pox, you still have that virus in your body. Do you wake up every day lamenting the fact that you technically have chicken pox? Of course not. Same thing applies as far as I'm concerned.
EVERY cucumber (person) left in the brine (alcohol) long enough WILL become a pickle. Key here is the amount of alcohol AND / OR the length of time one exposes oneself to an (any) addictive substance. How many cigarettes does it take for one to become addicted to smoking? No one knows the exact answer to exactly how many - surely the number differs from one person to another - but it's agreed that at some point addiction occurs.....and as with all addictions, there are changes in the brain - but we don't call it a "disease" when one is addicted to other substances than alcohol.
Drugs are addicting; alcohol (ethanol) is a drug. 12 oz of beer, 5 oz of wine, 1.5 oz of 80 proof liquor all contain the same amount of ethanol: an addictive substance.
In my thinking, alcoholism may well be a disease, but if so, well then, addiction to cigarettes, meth, heroin, prescription drugs, etc., etc. would also be a disease, all are addictive substances.
We do all have opinions (and I agree that's fine even though we may differ). I've done a lot of reading myself and I have come to realize for almost every opinion (fact) there is an opposing opinion (fact). So, we draw conclusions from what we learn. Interacting with my Mother (alcoholic) and my Son (meth addict) and learning all I could about Their addictions played a huge role in my opinions. I may not be completely correct in my opinion but neither am I completely wrong. This subject will continue to be debated
Regards
Addiction as a disease is not really debatable. It's a disease that's well documented. It has a medical diagnosis code and is described in detail in the DSM V ( Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of mental illnesses ). Not everyone becomes addicted to an intoxicating substance when exposed...dependence is separate from addiction. We all have our opinions and that's fine but there's no denying the facts.
P.S.
ethanol (alcohol) is a neurotoxic psychoactive DRUG
as are: sedatives, hypnotics, and narcotics - all are addictive drugs
certainly the brain goes through changes but fact is:
ethanol (present in ALL alcoholic beverage) is an addictive SUBSTANCE. EVERYONE has the potential of becoming addicted when exposing themselves to an addictive substance.
ALL addiction is progressive and ALL addictions can end in death
Alcohol is a drug, an addictive drug like the others. One doesn't say a person addicted to cigarettes has a disease, nor do I hear that other drug addicts have a disease - rather it's called addiction
My Mother was an alcoholic until the day She died. My Son was an alcoholic AND a drug addict until the day He died of an accidental drug overdose (acute phentanyl intoxication). They were both addicted to their drug of choice.
I mean NO disrespect to anyone. Opinions differ on this topic and I'm only stating my own opinion. I 'earned', 'learned' my opinion the hard way.
Regards,
Tink
I just wanted to rewrite this b/c I think this is a point that's overlooked ALOT....Vicki595: Treating addiction requires much more than abstinence and willpower!!!!!!
Treating addiction requires much more than abstinence and willpower! I love this statement!