My CA 19-9 level went from 36 in April of 2011 to 150 in Feb of 2012. I have had an MRI and a partial pancreatectomy and spleenectomy. There were no signs of cancer with any of the tests just high levels of 19-9. Does anyone know what this means?
Hi...i am 33 years old female from Indonesia... i just got my blood check result today... it turned out that my CA 19 9 is 74 U/ml...
my internist was a bit concerned about the number that he told me to give his senior a visit next Saturday (four days from today) to check what is the deal with my CA 19 9.
I was a smoker for years and i just quit recently for about five months now.. i was also diagnosed with Achalasia Esophagus three years ago.
my appetite is normal, sometimes even healthy, especially during PMS and i have not lost any significant weight at all.
i have no jaundice and no significan abdominal pain or backache, but i do get them occasionally during PMS.
i know that you have mentioned before that if i don't have any of the pancreas cancer symptoms, i should not be worried about having one since CA 19 9 is not an adequate test for cancer.
but it still worries me...
i don't know whether this forum still active or not..but i would appreciate any answer or comfort i can get...
is there other causes that can elevate my CA 19 9 level?
thank you so much...
GBU
i'm 75 year old my complaining just abdominal pain and 2 events of vomating my doctor tell me to do routine investgation and tumer marker
ALK ph 660mg/dl
ca19.9 was 90 iu
what i should to do in next step ?
Is a count of 302 CA 19-9 to be concerned about?
Hi. Because CA 19-9 is a test which is not specific or sensitive enough, it cannot be used as an initial screening tool for detecting cancer or any other condition. So repeated yearly testing for this tumor marker, in the absence of symptoms is an incorrect use of this test and will only lead to misleading results.
Thank you.
But would it be right to say that some activity is happening in the body to give an elevated CA19-9 reading? Or do some people in the population just have naturally slightly high readings?
Do we know whether people with elevated levels in the abnormal zone just off the normal levels (say hovering around high 30s and 40s) will eventually find themselves diagnosed with either benign or malignant conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, gallstones, liver or pancreas going forward as they perform yearly blood tests and find it rising a few points yearly? I am referring to people in their 50s and 60s.....
Hi. CA 19-9 is not used as a screening test to detect the presence of gastrointestinal (e.g. pancreatic) malignancy. Elevations in CA 19-9 levels are not specific enough (there are a lot of false positive results) to definitively rule in a diagnosis of cancer. Its proper use is to confirm a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, in the presence of some other findings (e.g. CT scan finding of a mass in the area of the pancreas). CA 19-9 levels above 37 units/ml are considered abnormal. In pancreatic cancer, CA 19-9 levels are typically in the range of hundreds or even thousands of units/ml. Since your levels are below that, I really don't think you should worry too much about it. In the absence of symptoms, I don't think that your CA 19-9 results warrant a CT scan of your abdomen. It's not necessary at this point.