You have little to worry about. As you point out the majority of your exposures were condom protected making them safe, even if the condom slipped down. In addition you have had negative HIV tests. The testing systems used in Canada are essentially the same as those used her in the U.S. and are superb. That you caught genital warts, given your history is not particularly surprising or alarming. the presence of genital wart infection will not have a negative impact on your HIV test, it is just as reliable in persons with warts as in people who do not have them.
Your other two problems , microhematuria and a WBC which is on the low side are not in the least suggestive of HIV. Each is a non-specific finding which could be entirely normal (this is the most common case) or are related to a huge number of other problems. The lowish WBC needs no investigation or therapy and radiological studies of your kidney are an appropriate first step in evaluation of microhematuria.
My sense is that after a "wild phase" in your sex life you have decided that is not who you are and perhaps are feeling a little guilt/anxiety. Please don't worry about HIV. There is absolutely no reason to think you might have it. EWH
I am very sorry about that.
I think you can understand the anxiety in people that would cause them to look in every corner for information. Just one last thing, I said that my WBC was slightly low...it is actually 3.7, was I correct to say slightly low or is that considered low and a concern due to its quantified number.
Thank you once again so very much for your answers...this service you and your colleagues provide is absolutly a great public service!
This is just the reason that searching the internet for "clues" to HIV risk is so very misleading and troublesome. These findings are terribly misleading and non-specific and do little more than increase unnecessary concerns for persons trying to assess their risk. Let me give you an example that is just about as misleading as the two you have focused on. did you know that 100% of persons with HIV have been shown to have oxygen in their blood? It's true but does that mean you have HIV if you have oxygen in your blood? Of course not since so do 100% of humans without HIV. The way that data are presented, particularly without context can be misleading. This is the reason we urge clients not to search the internet for "clues" when they can get answers through antibody testing. This is also the reason that we decline to participate in debates as to why we say what we do about individual questions. We simply do not have the time to correct all of the misperceptions that can be had through internet searches. EWH
Thank you very much for your response...but just something you wrote posed a questin for me...
You mentioned that microhematuria and low WBC is not the least suggestive of HIV, then why is it that the internet sitings I have found suggest otherwise? For instance, it states that HIV causes a low WBC count and 25% of HIV+ patients have hematuria. And you are correct that I do not wish to be promiscuous anymore!!
Oh... sorry I am leaving out one more thing. Isn't it true that HIV+ patients are approximately 25% likely to have hematuria. So why would hematuria and low WBC both show up in my system at the same time- thats a little weird to me?
I truely apologize if this turned out to be somewhat of a debate...I am just so stressed out and my mind forms all kinds of hypotheses!
I won't debate you. I quit. You asked for my opinion, I gave it. and 3.7 is just a little low. there are millons of health peole with WBCs of less than 4.
You need to get over your HIV fear as there is NO reason to be concerned about it. EWH