Your questions have been answered several times go back and reread them.
You had protected sex...no need to test simple as that.
For teak...
Thanks for reassurance, basically I am trying to convince my self that I have no exposure other wise 7 week test would have cought it.
I am going for another test tomorrow this will be 9.5 week. This is just to cover 6-8 week window as suggested by many. Do you think I need this or I'm fine without this. What would you do if you were in my position. PLS READ MY EXPOSURE details
Thanks for reassurance, basically I am trying to convince my self that I have no exposure other wise 7 week test would have cought it.
I am going for another test tomorrow this will be 9.5 week. This is just to cover 6-8 week window as suggested by many. Do you think I need this or I'm fine without this. What would you do if you were in my position. PLS READ MY EXPOSURE details
Stop trying to find ways that you had an exposure. If you did someone here would tell you. We are not here to lie to you.
can you answer the second question as well...what r the reasons for delayed seroconversion for a healthy person.
No that is not a risk either; you don't contract HIV from hand to genitalia.
How about using the hands to remove condom (with some vag fluid on it) and with same hands pulling the foreskin of penis...would that increase the risk?
Does such low risk mean delayed seroconversion since i got test negative at 7 weeks
The only way to get HIV sexually is from unprotected sex. It is as simple as that. Not from other surfaces like a condom or anything else.
How are you so confident. I've read Mucousal membranes of penis are capable of transmitting HIV. The question is how much vaginal fluid is required to be in contact with these membranes for transmission?
Is it possible to have such transmission
No you cannot get infected if your penis touched the outside of a condom.