I just wanted to post a follow up in the hopes it may help someone else. I ended up getting a lab test, and as predict it was negative. Thank you all for your support.
Hi.. Let me try to help. This is how testing works. First a diagnostic test is done to screen a person. This would be the 6th week antigen /antibody test followed by the conclusive antibody test at the 12th week time frame. You would read through you the forum that this is the recommended screen method that we always advise. Now in the event that any of this test turns positive, a confirmatory Western Blot test has to be taken to confirm whether a person is hisv positive or not. Only when the Western Blot shows a positive result, the person is deemed to be HIV positive.
Now in your scenario, you will be advised not to test because oral sex poses no risk at all for HIV infection. Why?. Because no one has been infected by having oral sex alone. No confirmed reported case so far. If it was a risk we would say it is a risk. But its not. The things you read over the internet aren't always true. If you sear the forum, you will not come across a person who has come back to say that he/she was infected by oral exposure. HIV just doesn't work that way.
False positive does do happen, when they do, a Western blot will follow. But the question here is, are you willing to go through the agony of a series of testing that you don't need in the first place if you hit a false positive? I'm not saying that you will hit a false positive but in the rarest of rare circumstances if you do?
Hope what I've written helps you to make a decision. As a final word, you really don't need testing as you had no risk.
Malbat.