In fact, I was not given the information. If you don't know the answer then just say so or don't post. Don't give evasive answers or completely skip over the question.
You were given the information. Move on.
This sounds like a copout. I am not asking for anything more than an explanation as to the difference between a splatter of blood which is infection "OUTSIDE OF ITS LIVING HOST" to blood going from wound to mucous membrane. Can someone please be direct here? I don't mean to sound rude, but the answers seem evasive.
Move on.
HIV is unable to reproduce outside its living host (unlike many bacteria or fungi, which may do so under suitable conditions), except under laboratory conditions; therefore, it does not spread or maintain infectiousness outside its host.
Do you realize that the blood was going directly from the open cut into the foreskin? Rubbed into it in fact.
do you have any idea how fast blood splatter to the eyes is moving?
How is it a different scenario? Blood goes directly to the mucous membrane Obviously HIV CAN live outside of its host for some amount of time, despite how small. If it can stay alive to infect via the eye, why not another membrane?
You did not have an exposure. HIV cannot live outside of its host and therefore could not infect you. Blood splatter to the eye is a totally different scenerio then yours is. Hope this helps.