HIV risk for protected sex and cunninglus

[markomaro2219]

Hi Guys,

I am from australia and i have risks that i am worried about.

1) 12th OCT

Went and saw a escort and i had protected sex. Condom was intact all my cum was on top inside condom so it didnt break. Although i notices some blood as she might be bleeding little from ******* but condom was intact...

I did an HIV TEST 24 DAYS AFTER THIS DUO negative alll std negative


2) 26th october.
Met a woman and all was done was i recieved oral and did cunninglus for 10 seconds. I spoke to the lady she did hiv test also and showed me results all negatiive,


The test i did last time was 24 days from first exposure and 10 days from next.

Should i retest ? Did i had a risk ?
I have spoken to sydney sextual centre and they said there has never been a case where someone got hiv from recieving oral or cunninglus.

I am not worried about second encounter but more from the first one where i did an HIV test but it was protected and all my cum was on top so i am sure it didnt break but i have read internet and it seems even protected sex is not safe..

[Sara_MHModerator]

As your question was fully answered you had no risk for HIV from your exposure, we hope you can now move on as you do not have HIV.

***  thread closed ***

[GuitarRox]

mike-no answered your question that you did not have a risk.  The only ways adults get HIV is from unprotected and penetrating vaginal or anal sex or sharing IV drug needles.  You wore a condom and it didn't break for sure.  Why are you asking if you need to retest for that?  You didn't need to test in the first place.  Oral sex is also not a risk.  Air and saliva inactivate the virus.  So, you should not worry about testing for either of these episodes. But you DID test and they were negative.  24 days in general is too early but you tested again 10 days later making that a 34 day test after your first exposure.  And again, no one gets HIV from oral sex.  So, no more testing needed (never was needed anyway), you do not have HIV.  

[markomaro2219]

Thanks a lot mate.. i am sure condom didnt break all my cum was on top of contact intact... but i get worried reading the internet....  I only did one test which was 23 days after protected exposure... I know its very hard to catch HIV from a woman and i am circumsized too but should i do another test ? how you suggest ?

[markomaro2219]

and i also had blood on my public area but condom was intact

[Chima7]

You have had no risk and don't need any tests. Seek therapy if you're unable to accept this fact.

[markomaro2219]

please let me know

[GuitarRox]

I already let you know.  This is not a risk.  Nothing you add will change that.  You had zero risk and do not need to test again.  That is the only answer you will get here.  You had no risk.  Move on.

[markomaro2219]

Thanks all .. I did another HIV combo test 30 days after the exposure 1 ... do i need to test more or can move on with my life out of these two exposures?

[mike_no]

You were never at risk, condoms are sufficient to prevent HIV transmission. Oral sex is not a risk.

You don't need to test.

[markomaro2219]

I did a test after 3 weeks but i was condom protected. Do i need another test ? I have seen protected sex is only 85 % safe all the websites say that.. All my cum was on top and my condom didnt break for sure.. Do i need further testing?