* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
I really did not get to see anything cause I turned my head to the side as soon as the girl lifted her skirt. I kinda knew that the girl was going to rub her crotch on my face so I turned away to avoid getting hit in the face head on. Basically, the contact was more in the cheek area.
This is the very reason why I have all these what if questions. I did not get to see if there really was blood or not. I am just assuming the worst case scenario. I guess, even if there was some blood, it wourl have not been infectious given that it would have had to pass the sanitary napkin, the panty, my face, my finger then to my eye when I rubbed them. Is this correct?
MOVE on.....
If this really happened, you had NO risk. You didnt even SEE any blood, so therefore, there couldn't have been any exposure.
Seek some help for your phobic thinking.
Last question Promise. I have read that most HIV infections through eyes were blood splashes. Does this mean that there has been no infection through eye rubbing?
POSSIBLE BLOOD TRANSFER? GGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
hiv is transmitted through
unprotected vaginal/anal intercourse
sharing iv drug works
mother to child
IF AND WHEN YOU HAVE ONE OF THE ABOVE EXPOSURES...FEEL FREE TO COME TO THIS FORUM FOR ASSESSMENT. WE DO NOT HAVE TIME TO DEAL WITH MADE UP SCENARIOS.
It sounds pretty irrational but my finger would have surely touched the part of my face with the possible blood transfer while rubbing my eyes. Of course if there was any.
I guess if indeed there was any blood transfer, the virus would have to be inactivated by then since it was already exposed to the environment right? Sorry for sounding crazy. Hope you guys don't get mad
gosh...this whole scenario that you have drummed up is just "irrational" thinking.