This answers all of your HIV questions, and if you can think of any more just reread about the 3. You had zero risk therefore testing is irrelevant to your situation because you had zero risk. HIV is a fragile virus, which is instantly inactivated in air and also in saliva which means it is effectively dead so it can't infect from touching, external rubbing or oral activities. It doesn't matter if you and they were actively bleeding or had cuts at the time either because the HIV is effectively dead.
Only 3 adult risks are the following:
1. unprotected penetrating vaginal with a penis
2. unprotected penetrating anal sex with a penis
3. sharing needles that you inject with.
The only way to get HIV is if you did one of the 3. The situation you describe is a long way from any of these 3.
Even with blood, lactation, cuts, rashes, burns, etc the air or the saliva does not allow inactivated virus to infect from touching, external rubbing or oral activities. Doctors have calculated the risk from what you describe to be less than that of being hit by a meteor, therefore no one will get HIV from what you did in the next 40 years of your life either. The above HIV science is 40 years old and very well established, so no detail that you can add to your encounter will change it from zero risk.
If you didn't have one of the 3 then you are just worrying about your own hiv theory - which is unrealistic for you to think that can become reality - so you should move on back to your happy life instead.
You can't get hiv when you used a condom. Cancel the hiv appointment and have fun instead. There is an std forum for that, however i doubt you have any std risk either.. Likely she is negative for hiv anyway, otherwise she wouldn't waste money on condoms because she uses them to protect herself from clients, not the other way around.
Many thanks for allaying my fears my friend. I am still going to spend 300 pounds sterling on my STI test for price of mind though, just to be sure, and in any event I should have one very so often even if I only do protected sex. I also have a girlfriend and would never ever wish to hurt her.
I neglected to say she didn’t provide the condom, I did. She didn’t have any condoms with her. I think she is forced into her profession by a pimp. She told me she gets beaten and I saw a burn mark on her from her boss. It is sad. But it makes it more likely she has unprotected sex which entails more risk.
Thanks again. You are very kind to spend your time thinking and writing to me. Much appreciated.
A condom protects you from HIV transmission as long as the head is covered. The only way adults get HIV is from unprotected vaginal or anal intercourse or sharing of IV drug needles. Her spit would not spread the virus as enzymes in saliva render the virus inactive and air does the same. There are no reported, documented proven cases of someone getting HIV from oral contact. The same goes for her vaginal secretions on her fingers. Air will inactivate it. The HIV virus is fragile and easily broken down.
So, you had zero risk.
Well, I'm not sure why you are asking if a test is accurate that you acknowledge you don't need because you didn't have a risk. If you didn't have a risk, all tests will be negative whenever you take them.
But a duo test is accurate at 28 days in general.
Last time. You didn't have a risk. The ONLY risks are having UNprotected vaginal or anal intercourse or sharing IV drug needles. Any symptoms or this or that you have is NOT hiv related as your activity including the saliva you are very worried about (and has been explained to you it has enzymes that inactivate hiv) -- you did not have a risk. Colds happen to everyone.
Move on, you don't need to worry about HIV.