hold your hand up and look at your finger...then look at your penis.
dont you think that you would know the difference? c'mon now.....
Look your sarcasm is not appreciated. Im aware in thickness differences but when you feel you were doing Safe activities and then you become ill you tend to run by every base to make sure in fact you did what you remember you did. I was merely gaging level of risk. I still thank you for taking the time to respond; just not your tone.
I don't think Lizzie was was ever sarcastic. I personally feel that you do not have that sense of humor to pick up what she actually said.
Fingering does not have any risk of HIV transmission. As you were sure that it was his finger, (so I moved his finger out really quickly and as soon as I felt the tip of his finger), why are you bringing a penis into the discussion?
Sorry, my previous post was for rogers, not for LIZZIE. My apologies for a wrong "copy/paste" action.
I guess i wasn't looking for humor. I went through my memory of my activities and then realized a tiny possibility of something happening. This forum seems to be a place where questions are answered for various scenarios and I came here when I thought of the question that I didn't see completely answered in past forums: if someone both minimally and briefly enters you is it automatically reason for immediate care or definite testing. The response left me feeling like fool. I am aware that I put myself in a questionable and foolish situation...I don't need to feel twice as bad for not knowing thicknesses. Like I sad, I still appreciate the work and help of all individuals here. I just didn't appreciate how the information was relayed.
Just to clear it up, You would know if it were a penis - It would not go in to you with ease
From what you describe you were at NO risk of HIV infection at all
Hope this helps
Thank you for your response--very much appreciated.