Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
Avatar universal

Accuracy of Cardiac MRI

In Feb of this year I was diagnosed with PPCM (pregnancy induced cardiomyopathy) with an EF of 40-45%.  I had no symptoms so my cardiologist ordered another ECHO in April that showed my EF to still be in the 40-45% range, but he said it looked a little better.  In May, I had a cardiac MRI done and it showed an EF of 57%, which I was obviously very happy about.  My question is, which is more accurate, ECHO or MRI?  I had one cardiologist tell me that MRIs over-read EF and she typically takes the number from most recent ECHO and from MRI and splits the difference and says that is what your EF is.  
2 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
Avatar universal
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL
Cardiac MRI is the most accurate available noninvasive imaging technique for determination of EF.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
In response to your answer, since I am going in for another ECHO in July, should I expect the results of this ECHO to be similar to my cardiac MRI results?  Or it likely that the ECHO will show a lesser EF because it is not as advanced a technology?

Thanks!
Helpful - 0

You are reading content posted in the Heart Disease Forum

Popular Resources
Is a low-fat diet really that heart healthy after all? James D. Nicolantonio, PharmD, urges us to reconsider decades-long dietary guidelines.
Can depression and anxiety cause heart disease? Get the facts in this Missouri Medicine report.
Fish oil, folic acid, vitamin C. Find out if these supplements are heart-healthy or overhyped.
Learn what happens before, during and after a heart attack occurs.
What are the pros and cons of taking fish oil for heart health? Find out in this article from Missouri Medicine.
How to lower your heart attack risk.