I certainly would go with the first EP.. This exact thing happened to me. More then a few of my EKGS came back either borderline or flat out long QT but in all those EKGS I had sinus tach so it was over estimated.. My EP measured them manually and said I did not have a prolonged QT in any of them...
I do have a family history of sudden death on my fathers side and have been suffering lightheaded spells since 2010 which were a rare occurrence once several months but the last year and a half the episodes have become frequent. Still I believe I do not have long qt syndrome...
You can have blood work done to see if you carry the gene for it. I am actually going to do the hereditary heart testing through color. They test 30 different genes for hereditary heart disease and 2 of them are for long qt syndrome. Just a thought.
This is strictly a layman's OPINION, but I would put my trust in the first EP who took the time to sit down, and manually calculate the time span. I had an EP like that who spent extra time doing a little research. Doing my procedure, he found a small overlap in my septal wall to sneak the catheter through and thus avoided the septal puncture. He also told me the "computer analysis is BS", and are merely a guide, and a rough one at that.
Is your heart rate typically that high, or like me do you have Lab Coat Syndrome? Finally, have you ever displayed any symptoms associated with long QT? Fainting or seizures, family history, jumbled arrhythmia? If it were myself, I'd listen to the first guy (or girl).