Aa
Help With Hepatitis C Test Interpretation?
On or about October 5 I had a Hep C test completed as part of a 10 Panel STD check. The results at that time came back as < 0.1 which was negative. This test was done at about 4 weeks post potential exposure. Then, on October 26th, I had another 10 panel test and the value was indicated as 0.1, also negative.
My concern is that I have read that Hep C may not show up on a blood test until 8 - 9 weeks post exposure. I had the second test at the beginning of the 8th week.
Would the results suggest that I am actually positive due to the change in values from < 0.1 to 0.1?
My concern is that I have read that Hep C may not show up on a blood test until 8 - 9 weeks post exposure. I had the second test at the beginning of the 8th week.
Would the results suggest that I am actually positive due to the change in values from < 0.1 to 0.1?
I wouldn't worry about it. If you were recently "infected" and as some of the other comments here are claiming the antibodies are "building up" - you would have an acute case that would be accompanied by symptoms or at least something like elevated ALT levels. This is a test that should be banned, IMHO because the anxiety causes more harm than the test results. Hep B chronic carriers, however, really should be informed of their status.
Really, Hep C is not a sexually transmitted disease. The drug industry has basically talked it up as a way to get the AIDS activists on the Hep C bandwagon and sell testing and drugs through their existing astro-turf activists in service to Big Pharma. It shouldn't even be in the STD panel, and it only ended up that way due to the regulatory capture of guidelines bodies. The CDC will say "HCV sexual transmission is rare" - really, it's non-existent, and they know it.
Really, Hep C is not a sexually transmitted disease. The drug industry has basically talked it up as a way to get the AIDS activists on the Hep C bandwagon and sell testing and drugs through their existing astro-turf activists in service to Big Pharma. It shouldn't even be in the STD panel, and it only ended up that way due to the regulatory capture of guidelines bodies. The CDC will say "HCV sexual transmission is rare" - really, it's non-existent, and they know it.
The small change in number is simply test variation. It has no significance.
It can take up to 12 weeks to develop enough hep C antibodies to develop to reach testable levels assuming you have a normal immune system. If you are immune compromised as in the presence of co-infection with HIV or anti rejection immune suppressing medicines it can take as long as 6 months for enough antibodies to rise to detectable levels.
So any testing prior to 12 weeks post a concerning exposure is simply a waste of time.
Hep c is principally a blood borne infection and relatively difficult to transmit. Most often hep c is transmitted by sharing of IV drug equipment between drug users.
Did you experience a possible blood to blood contact with blood known to be infected with hep c?
It can take up to 12 weeks to develop enough hep C antibodies to develop to reach testable levels assuming you have a normal immune system. If you are immune compromised as in the presence of co-infection with HIV or anti rejection immune suppressing medicines it can take as long as 6 months for enough antibodies to rise to detectable levels.
So any testing prior to 12 weeks post a concerning exposure is simply a waste of time.
Hep c is principally a blood borne infection and relatively difficult to transmit. Most often hep c is transmitted by sharing of IV drug equipment between drug users.
Did you experience a possible blood to blood contact with blood known to be infected with hep c?
8 Comments
I am not entirely certain. I did have unprotected anal sex with pull out method.
Did your partner have hepatitis C?
Their status is unknown.
Could you ask them?
Either that or test at the correct time 12 weeks post. If you should have a concerning exposure in the future only test at 12 weeks post exposure, tests prior to that are without diagnostic value and a waste of time.
Either that or test at the correct time 12 weeks post. If you should have a concerning exposure in the future only test at 12 weeks post exposure, tests prior to that are without diagnostic value and a waste of time.
He related that in the past he had Hepatitis A. He is going for testing and hopefully that will put much of my concerns at rest... fingers crossed.
Hepatitis A and hepatitis C are unrelated and caused in different manners by different viruses.
Hepatitis A is basically food borne oral fecal transmission. Hepatitis C is blood borne
Hepatitis A is basically food borne oral fecal transmission. Hepatitis C is blood borne
He tested negative for Hepatitis A, B & C.
Congratulations you cannot contract an infection from a person who does not have an illness
Have an Answer?
You are reading content posted in the Hepatitis C Community
Learn about this treatable virus.
Getting tested for this viral infection.
3 key steps to getting on treatment.
4 steps to getting on therapy.
What you need to know about Hep C drugs.
How the drugs might affect you.
These tips may up your chances of a cure.
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.
Herpes sores blister, then burst, scab and heal.
Herpes spreads by oral, vaginal and anal sex.
STIs are the most common cause of genital sores.
Condoms are the most effective way to prevent HIV and STDs.
PrEP is used by people with high risk to prevent HIV infection.
