It could be that he's not up on the latest research, or it could be other factors involving your response to previous tx, or possibly he is concerned that you are too close to cirrhosis to take a chance with the shorter therapy. All patient with cirrhosis (stage 4) must do 48 weeks even if they do respond rapidly, as the virus is better able to evade the drugs inside a more scarred liver. If your biopsy is old or if he mistrusts the pathologist who read it, he may fear that your fibrosis is actually worse than a 3. Really what you need to do is ask your doctor why he is recommending 48 weeks. If he doesn't have a good answer then you should ask for a referral to a hepatologist, for a second opinion, and then maybe just stay with the new doc. I had to do 48 weeks because of cirrhosis, and it was hellish but it worked, and I'd make the same decision for tx today if I had to do it over.
hello,
I treated in 2011 and did 24 wks with incevik. I failed treatment before when I didn't clear at 12 weeks, stopped with the old tx. My doc said if I was undect at 4 wks, 24 wks was the tx course. If you were a null responder prior maybe that is why, otherwise if you were a relapser before you should consider seeing someone else. 48 wks is tough, I would get a second opinion. Just my thoughts. You need a good reason for 48 wks, this stuff is brutal.
Maybe your past response has something to do with it? It's always best to ask your treating doctor as his reasons would be something your pharmacist knows nothing about.......... Best to you.