Greetings,
My brother has a 9 year old bull who underwent a splenectomy one month ago. 3 days ago he started showing signs of not being well. He had lost a lot of weight(partially diet), was very listless, stopped eating, was dehydrated, wobbly on his feet, and had very pale gums and dark urine, although temp was a high normal at 102.5. After waiting a day until I went and saw the dog and told him to bring him to the vet, and then waiting another day before making the appointment, he ended up bringing him to the emergency hospital last night.
After a blood tranfusion and I don't know what else the dog is better and happy at the hospital and might be released tomorrow.
Apparently my brother forgot that right after he got the dog 6 1/2 years ago (when the dog was 2) he was sick and diagnosed with babesia and treated. He didn't realize that babesia is permanent, although can go dormant for long periods of times. He never had a relapse until after the splenectomy last month. As far as the spleen is concerned, I've just read that in dogs with babesia, an enlarged spleen is the norm, and without it the parasite is more likely to activate, especially after illnesses, surgeries, etc.
I am thinking now that they should have never removed the spleen, and now that it is gone, this dog will have recurring episodes of the parasite, and will need blood transfusions for the rest of his life. Is it more likely for him to get sick more often now, and how manageable is this without his spleen? He needs the acl surgery, but I'm afraid that it will aggravate the parasite and cause more complications, do you think we should do it? We just want the dog to be happy and comfortable, but we are out of money and resources.
I am in need of an outside expert's opinion, so I can try and help my brother take the best care of this dog, and I would appreciate any insights. Thank you very much
JMR