Why is it we will cut into the eye to correct vision when a persons eyes are healthy and they can obtain contacts and eyeglasses, but when a person has tons of floaters it's something they have to live with?
It's easily pawned off as "part of life". I'm sure when someone has one or two, even in each eye, it's livable. But, even if someone's vision is not totally blocked by floaters, they are difficult to live with when each eye contains a swarm of them. To tell someone to live with it is a life sentence in most cases. Yet, the idea of treating a patient with lots of them is considered surgery to a healthy eye? What is an unhealthy eye then? I was under the impression the purpose of an eye was to provide vision. If something is blocking that vision, is that not a problem? I've read the risks to the eye for vitrectomy is 5%, and far less in the case of an FOV that does not require sutures. I don't understand why we will go to incredible lengths to correct vision (a worthy cause, don't get me wrong), but blocked vision from floaters is irrelevant.
I appreciate doctors do what I cannot. I am not educated on this matter either, nor do I want to imply I know anything they don't. So, I'm sure there's a response to everything I've said as to all the "why we can'ts". But, I don't understand why we don't even try. The indifferent and uninterested response I've gotten from every eye doctor I've ever seen, and all the comments I've read on other web sites, leads me to believe there is no interest in finding a solution to floaters.
Te only thing floater sufferers (the one's with many of them) get used to is the idea they have no hope for relief from their ailment. It's defeat that they become accustomed to, not the floaters.
I would implore the doctors to find a solution for us. I appreciate there are diseases, and blindness and other major issues that need addressed. But, please do not patronize our condition, and please do not accept "that's life".