P.S. There are doctors on MedHelp who would tell you to stick with the monofocal because of various kinds of complaints with all the premium lenses.
The FDA's Summary of Safety and Effectiveness on it is glowing. I think it appears to have the highest rate of patients who would choose the lens again.
I'd make an extra effort to find a doctor who has experience with it. It is new in the US.
The FDA Summary doesn't address intermediate vision. I think glasses for computer is not unusual. The FDA study reports exceeding high freedom from glasses, but I've seen a lot of anecdotal stuff that led me to think that glasses for computer is not unusual.
Also, be sure you understand the issue of dysphotosias with multi-focals--the reason they don't give them to truck drivers and airline pilots.
I almost chose the Technis Multifocal but became concerned that it's not very good in one eye only and that I would have poorer vision for the computer (even if I didn't need glasses). I had a cataract in one eye only and I had read a few things to the effect that a multifocal is notoriously bad in one eye only. I also didn't like that it is designed such that intermediate vision starts at 18".
I chose the Crystalens. I seem to have had a phenomenal result, but I need a YAG Capsulotomy and will not know for certain until that takes place in October.
With Crystalens it still seems as if there are a lot of bad results and a lot of good results. One thing I strongly urge if you go that route is to find a doctor who is a Crystalens Center of Excellence (see the Crystalens website) and ideally know people who have gotten Crystalenses from that doctor.