You do not have oral leukoplakia. White patches in the mouth are very common and very few are OHL.
If you were infected from your vaginal sex exposure, your 86th day rapid test would have been positive. Since the test was negative, you could not have been infected. This is all that is relevant to determining your HIV status- everything else is irrelevant and misleading. Focus on your test results and stop looking for symptoms.
I am closing this thread because there is nothing more to discuss. Please take up any further concerns with a mental health professional.
--------------------------------------------THREAD CLOSED----------------------------------------------------
i have oral hairy leukoplakia which leads me to believe i am positive. there is a white patch towards the back of my tongue on both sides. im freaking out
Even if she was newly infected all your test show you aren't infected. Two good things here...1) you tested after a month which is a good indicator u aren't infected bc most ppl will test positive
by a month and esp by two weeks. 2) u tested out to 3months and u r still negative. So, u can rest assured that u r negative. Be happy & move on w life!
dude i did the same as you had sex without protecion dude i think ur fine its 8 months since exposure and neg ur good ur probably suffering from anxiety dude anyways theres a low chance of you having hiv beacase u didnt recieve no liquid its said that its a lower chance to get hiv from a female if ur a male! dude ur good go get testes again if u want an relax im worried in 2 weaks will be mine 3 months and am anxious !!
GOD love u bro peace!
what if she was newly infected. they say its easier to get if the person is newly infected