Welcome to the forum. Thanks for your question.
Many websites, public health agencies, etc have a take-no-chances policy, i.e. a CYA stance based on advice from their legal departments. They often recommend against all sexual practices that have (or were once thought to have) even a theoretical risk of transmisison, even if there are few or no cases of actual HIV transmission. On this forum, however, we rely on data about actual documented transmissions.
Oral sex on men -- i.e. fellatio, perhaps especially when there is ejaculation in the mouth -- probably has resulted in a few HIV infections in the oral partners. However, HIV has never been believably transmitted to the insertive (penile) partner in fellatio, by cunnilingus (to either partner), or by kissing. Sores in the mouth (tooth wounds, canker sores, gum inflammation, etc) are extremely common, and yet still almost nobody catches HIV by oral exposure. Therefore, it is apparent that they make no significant difference in risk.
Here are links to several threads that go into these issues in greater detail. Read the follow-up comments in addition to the initial answers.
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/show/1415872
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/show/1526411
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/show/1721189
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/show/1830230
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/show/1884090
For those reasons, the "subject" of your question (I'm assuming it's you) is not at risk of HIV from the events you have described. I don't buy the possibility there was vaginal penetration that you "don't know" about. But even if there were, the transmission risk from any single vaginal sex exposure is low (average 1 chance in 2,000 if the female has HIV).
Therefore, you can expect your upcoming test to be negative. An HIV antibody test, including Oraquick, is conclusive at 115 days after the last exposure. When it is, you can move on with 100% certainty you didn't catch HIV. Your symptoms make no difference. Even if the symptoms or their timing were typical for ARS (they are not), testing always overrules both symptoms and exposure history.
Feel free to return with a comment to report the test result. However, it is pointless to speculate when a definitive answer will soon be available -- so let's not have any further discussion until then.
Regards-- HHH, MD