thank you doctor for your quick answer and assurance. I really trust the judgment of the doctores here. but from no where the what if thoughts attack me. this is my problem, not a lack of clarification from you.
Today I contacted the lab to make sure which test exactly they were doing, it was
an antibody and antigen (roche), unlike the antibody test I did 1-4 weeks after the exposures wich you then responded to.
know with this new information.
1) is it more conclusive know after nowing its a duo test? does it make any diffrence. (some say that the antigene dies anyways after 6-8 weeks)
2) why i seem to be worried all the time ( I even went to the lab 4 times to make sure that they said I am negative, then the lab technican just told me to leave) . I all the way thought that fingering wasnt a risk but then before testing I checked this site and saw that if there was a cut there may be a risk. If I knew this beforehand I wouldnt even go there.
3) if you think I shoud forget about the hiv, which wa the hard part, what other std test do you recommend to clear all possibilities. ( I already did hepb)
just to end this whole issue I want to know if I can move forward without even 1% of risk hanging, because all the time I am thinking what if she had a cut, or she caused a cut in me and ....... although they massaged me for at least 45 minutes before fingering me, is this enough time to heal a cut if she had (they told me they put alcohol on their hand before they massage a client to check if they have a cut on their hand) I just keep thinking and thinking, + they have been checked for hiv and hepb at lest 1.7 year ago, one of them 6 months ago. they were asian.
sorry for the long post but wanted your thoughts on the update about the testing method. and can I reach 100% assurance.
details of my exposures are here.
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/STDs/Risk-Assessment-/show/1359738?personal_page_id=1805128#post_6208181