I was recently diagnosed with hepatitis c. I am 54 years old and I probably contracted the disease more than 30 years ago. I have no current symptoms. According to the liver biopsy its at a stage 2 moderate fibrosis and grade 2-3 moderate inflammation. My doctor is recommending treatment. What I'm wondering is if anyone has any information about the likelihood, if it has taken 30 years to develop to a stage 2, that it would progress to cirrosis of the liver if left untreated. What I'm wondering is does that mean it is slow progressing? Or, does that mean that there is a strong likelihood that it would progress to more serious liver damage if untreated? What I'm trying to do is weigh the benefits/side effects of treatment with the risk of developing more serious liver damage if untreated, but I just don't know what the odds are, and what the significance is for it to be at a stage 2 after 30 years. Can anyone shed some light on this?.