thank you very much, Terri, that does it!
Sorry. I will try to elaborate for you. If you used a condom for all intercourse related activities, your urethra itself was not exposed to HSV 2 infection. The reason I answered your question with information about HSV 1 is because the only HSV your urethra would be exposed to, specifically, is HSV 1 from oral sex. To be clear, I think HSV 2 infection in the urethra alone in this situation is extremely unlikely. While it is possible that you could have contracted HSV 2 genitally, I think having urethral symptoms with no skin presentations is extremely unlikely. If you had acquired HSV 2 genitally, I would expect some genital lesions as well as urethral symptoms, especially since you did use a condom.
We don't really have worries about HSV penetrating a condom, particularly latex condoms as they provide good protection. However, since condoms reduce the risk of acquiring herpes overall by about 30-50%, you could still have acquired herpes. but you have no skin lesions per your post, so I think it is very unlikely that you would get herpes and have only urethral symptoms.
Urethritis with no skin lesions with HSV 2 infection is, in my experience, with a first infection, would be very unusual. I have not seen this particular presentation ever in 32 years of practice.
In terms of my answer to your question about when to test, I would again say that if you continue to have sex with this person, the testing date is a moving target. If you don't have sex with this person any more, then I would recommend that you allow 4 months from the encounter before you test for greatest accuracy. Statistics suggest that 50% of people who acquire HSV 2 will be positive after 3 weeks, 70% after 6 weeks, and most everyone else by 4 months from the encounter. the test that you should use should be one based on glycoprotein G or the western blot. These tests include herpeselect or the type specific test by Captia that LabCorp uses. You may also use the Biokit, an in office test.
I hope this response more fully meets your needs.
Terri
i am unhappy with Terri Warren's very limited response to my paid query. She did not address my specific questions!
Terri, if you would take a look at my identical post in the community forum it gives more details and maybe it would help you shed more light on my case. thanks.
Terri, I am asking you about hsv-2 infection to my urethra, not hsv-1...I would like to know if hsv-2 entering uncovered penis skin could penetrate and somehow get into my urethra without creating lesions on my penis. Also, how uncommon is urethritis without lesions as the only symptom of first outbreak.
I think NGU due to the traditional organisms is unlikely given your constant condom use is unlikely. And since you already have HSV 1, new infection at the urethra is very unlikely.
The IgM test is not useful. And I would stop taking antiviral therapy if you want to continue to test as it may throw off the results.
And ELISA would be fine as a place to start. And yes, it needs to be type specific for certain! But if you are having regular sex with this person, the test is always going to be a moving target (not that you shouldn't have sex with this person).
Terri