I posted a question on May 23 regarding an undiagnosed neuroligical condition, and you were good enough to reply. In your reply, you mentioned Wilson's disease. In December of last year, my aunt informed me that two of her cousins (my father's side) had Wilson's disease. As she knew that I was undiagnosed, she thought I might want to check out the possibility of this disease. Prior to this I had never heard of Wilson's disease, but I called the nurse at my neuro's office and he ordered a 24 hr urine copper, which was normal. In February when I presented at this office with dystonia or tonic spasms in my right hand and foot (this had happened previously in November as well, but not as severe), he asked me if he had ever tested me for Wilson's disease. When I told him he had, he once again checked the results of the 24hr urine. In March when he injected botox in my right calf, he mentioned it again. Now I post a question here, and you mention Wilson's disease. Is the 24 hr urine copper definitive for excluding a Wilson's disease diagnosis? I've been having symptoms for years, and in the last six months, I have heard more about this illness, which I've been told is a rare hereditary disease....it's making me wonder, even with the negative urine result, should I look further?
Thanks again for your help.