First of all, thank you so much all of your expertise in this forum. Let me preface my question by saying that I have read your views on the usefulness of IgM extensively. 3 months ago I had unprotected sex and oral sex with my girlfriend. I made her get her blood tested for herpes and other stds, and that ostensibly came back negative. I became anxious that I got herpes from her and have gone to see 3 different dermatologists, a GUM doctor, and a urologist since then. Each one told me to stop worrying and that I definitely do not have herpes. At the 3 month mark after exposure, I decided to get some bloodwork done. Two tests were done, including Herpeselect type-specific IgG and HSV Ab IgM W/RFLX TITER. The results of the Herpeselect showed that I was negative for HSV1 and HSV2. The IgM test, though, initially detected the antibody in the first part of the test, but the RFLX TITER came back negative. My question(s): (1) disregarding whether IgM is useful or not, what does it mean if antibody is detected in the initial screen but the titers come back negative? (2) could it be that my result indicates a recent infection and not enough time has passed for IgG seroconversion? (3) Do you consider my IgM result positive? (4) Lastly, could you give me a brief explanation for false positives in the IgM antibody screen? I know I'm being paranoid, but the reason I'm asking these questions is that I had a confirmed NGU after that encounter which apparently resolved on its own. Thank you so much for your help and this wonderful service!