Doctor Hook,
Have a follow-up question. I read in your numerous posts to others that HSV Igg tests cannot always be trusted. I am not sure what it means but I tried to relate it to my case.
My situation from the last post to you is still unchanged. I had repeat Igg tests done subsequently at 16 weeks and a Biokit test done at 5 months post exposure, both negative. I also managed to get one of my sores cultured (if you could refer to it as a sore as it was so small my doctor took a long time to find it, so although it was fresh I don't think he could get a good sample from it), which also came back negative. Please note it was not a PCR so the chances of it being falsely negative are high. I'm still experiencing the intermittent tingling, pain, lower back pain radiating to the groin/legs, genital irritation, etc but if I do get a paper cut sore with the symptoms they are becoming much smaller and less noticeable.
I'm not sure what to do at this point, and your comment on the trustworthiness of the ELiSA tests really gets me worried about false negatives.
Can you shed some light on what you mean by your words on the Igg reliability? Also, in your opinion, what should my plan of action be in pretty much all absence of "good" sores to be cultured, my last test being negative at 5 months post exposure, my ongoing symptoms, etc. My thinking is to get another Igg Herpeselect test now (6 months post exposure) and if negative follow up with a Western Blot. Would you add anything or disagree with any part of my post? Thank you.
Both PCR and culture are methods for showing the virus is present. With culture the virus is grown from the specimen taken. With PCR biochemical methods are use to detect and amplify the DNA of the virus. For a number of reasons including that specimens taken for culture can die in transport, PCR is more sensitive than culture. EWH
Thanks for a prompt reply on a holiday weekend!
Can you explain the difference between PCR and culture? It's still essentially taking a sample of the sores, is it not, just more sensitive than actual culture?
Welcome to the Forum. I read your interaction with Grace and agree with the advice that you received. Several thoughts which may be helpful:
1. At this time there is no evidence that your lesions are genital herpes. The pain pattern you describe is not typical (pain for weeks, pain without lesions, the extent of the pain all do not fit) and your HSV-2 blood tests are repeatedly negative. By now most (but admittedly not all) people would have positive tests).
2. You have antibodies for HSV-1 and get cold sores. You have oral herpes. To attribute your symptoms to genital HSV-1 doesn't make sense given that infection in two sites is most unusual an since having already had HSV-1 before your encounter of concern, there was very, very little chance of getting HSV-1 again in a new location.
3. If your doctor is willing, you may wish to arrange in advance for a PCR test (not culture) at your next outbreak. Either with planning before hand or even taking the test swabs home with you with plans to drop them off after you take the test yourself will help to get this done if your next occurrence happens at an inconvenient time. After the specimen is taken, they can be kept in the refrigerator. PCR is preferable to culture as it is more sensitive.
I doubt that this is HSV. Re-testing with the tests used to date, or a Western blot at 6 months should provide definitive information about HSV antibodies. Hope this helps. EWH