HBV is somewhat more frequenly heterosexually transmitted than your PCP seems to believe, but it remains true that almost nobody catches it from a single episode of unprotected sex. Otherwise I agree exactly with his assessment and advice.
Dear Dr. HHH:
I called my PCP today about the LFT results and testing for HBV. He didn't recommend testing absent certain symptoms and risk categories in which I do not fall. He said HBV is rarely transmitted sexually through normal heterosexual intercourse. He stated those at risk are IV drug users and people who engage in anal sex. What's more, he looked at a recent CT scan on my abdomen (I had this done for a kidney stone) and said my liver is in excellent shape. He said my levels and CT scan are not indicative of HBV or any hepatitis. For this reason he did not recommend testing. Beyond the physiological benefit I would gain from a negative result, do you agree with my PCP's assessment that I should not worry about this and simply move on?
Thank you.
Serious consequences of HBV can occur anywhere from a few months to 50 years (or more) after infection.
My view is that your LFTs were not significantly "out of whack". Changes in blood chemistry results are generally meaningless if both results are well within the normal range, as yours were on both tests. However, Dr. Schiano is the liver expert, not me. But he certainly would agree those results do not suggest HBV or any other infectious hepatitis.
But this all remains speculation. I'll be happy to comment one more time when your HBV test results are available.
Serious consequences of HBV can occura nywhere from a few months to 50 years (or more) after infection.
My view is that your LFTs were not significantly "out of whack". Changes in blood chemistry results are generally meaningless if both results are well within the normal range, as yours were on both tests. However, Dr. Schiano is the liver expert, not me. But he certainly would agree those results do not suggest HBV or any other infectious hepatitis.
But this all remains speculation. Report your HBV test results if you wish, but I won't have any more advice until then.
Thank you. I will request a test and post the results. One last question, if you would be so kind. What typically is the timeline for "late stage" symptoms to persist? If infected in 2003, which I understand may be doubtful, would my LFT's be "out of whack" after 9 years without treatment and a history of moderate to heavy alcohol consumption?
Welcome to the STD forum. Thanks for your question.
I looked at your discussion on the liver transplantation forum. In your last comment there, you correctly predicted my response to this question. The statistical chance you caught HBV during your vaginal sex exposure back in 2003 is very low; and I agree your slightly different liver function tests are not a concern and unlikely to be caused by HBV or any other form of hepaitis.
You are also correct that your flu-like symptoms in 2008 were too late to be due to HBV acquired back in 2003. The late symptoms of hepatitis B are caused by ongoing serious liver damage; they are not flu-like or transient, but would persist pretty much indefinitely. And your blood test results show you do not have such significant liver damage.
Having said all that, there is an immediate answer to your anxiety: get tested for HBV. I recommend it not because I believe it is likely you are infected, but for the reassurance you likely would gain from the negative test result.
As for concern about transmitting HBV to your wife, I'm not going to speculate. If your test results are positive we can discuss that aspect at that time; until then it is pointless to speculate.
If you get tested, I would be happy to comment if you want to return to let me know the result. In the meantime, do your best to not worry. The chance you have HBV is very low.
Regards-- HHH, MD