I just went and reread that whole post, and no, it makes no sense. We see alot of this at work....children being removed from parental custody, child abandonment, etc. It's certainly not what I specialize in, but I do know a bit about it just from being exposed to it. First off, even if the birth parent requests a child be left with another family or adult, there is still a background check to be done. Social Services would never, ever, leave a child with a registered sex offender. It just wouldn't happen. So unless the laws are completely different from Canada to the States, which I highly doubt, there is very little chance her story is true. Secondly, she is not a relative, or an authorized foster parent. If the police and child welfare were called, more then likely the child would have been placed in a foster home and she could apply for temporary custody. Thirdly, the police would never ever make that decision...only child welfare could. At least that's the way it works here. She's a nutjob.
LOL!!! it is all just too funny.... she is a whack job, and I hope the entire story is made up and there is no little boy.... that is the only thing that scares me! if it is god forbid true.
anniebrook yes i meant it as in jesus, people! haha i would never call anyone a jesus person. that just didnt make sense. well im done with that post, ill wait till the next loony shows up. i have to say its been awhile since we have seen any entertaining posts like that lol.
So, tell, perty, when you said the phrase "jesus people" in your post, did you mean it in exasperation, (such as "Jesu, people! Get your heads out of your butts!") or were you really calling them "Jesus people," (as in "flower children" or "Bible thumper")? The zip code gal (91010 or whatever the number is) certainly took it as though you were calling her a Bible thumper. (I thought you were merely being blasphemous. LOL)
mslkpage, thanks for the clarification on the hubby's status and why the police might let the baby stay where it is. The guy surely wouldn't bear scrutiny on an official adoption, the background check would find it, so if this story is (in any way) correct as she tells it, she would obviously be leery about doing the obvious thing, which would be to try to adopt the baby. Also, they probably don't have much money.
My guess is, with not much else to go on besides some pm's and what we're seeing in her posts, she's lonely, has limited prospects, is entirely obsessed with having another baby, and now something has happened in her life with her friend's baby -- possibly she urged her friend to hand over the baby to her but doesn't want to admit it on the site. (It's more righteous if the baby was dumped, and it does sound like the baby was at least emotionally dumped.) But who knows. At least she did not make up a dramatic tale about a family member who left her with (was it three?) kids for a few days and then the couple took a multi-state road trip and got in a car crash and both adults died. THAT girl had us all going for days.
that other 91whatever person is making me crazy as well!! they say we dont know the whole story, well if we dont how can we make a proper decision on what to do, she did say all to answer right? lol
I don't understand why a neighbor would find the little guy abandoned and not call the proper authorities? I can't imagine anyone not calling the police and/or social services. Even if the neighbor knew the mothers friends, I can't imagine that being the first phone call.....this sstaceyy sounds a bit off to me.