I was just diagnosed with Mondor's but am very confused. I have looked up the disease on the internet, read quite a bit but it does not sound like what I have. Is it possible to have Mondor's but have a lump, not a cordlike band? I have had no trauma to the breast, no suregery or procedures, everything was fine, I went for my yearly breast exam and it was normal. About 1 week later, I was in the shower and noticed a dimpling of the skin. I felt around and felt a very distinct lump. I talked to my doctor that day and she said it might be a cyst and since my mammogram was only 4 days away, to wait and see what it said. My mammogram was normal, so she set up an ultrasound. The US results came back saying "there is a lump at the 1 o'clock position that is hypoechoic without blood flow. It is fairly smoothly marginated and is wider than tall, measures 1.2 x 0.3 x 0.7 cm. This lesion could be evaluated with ultrasound-guided biopsy given the fact that there appears to be dimpling in this area. If it is elected not to perform biopsy, follow up of this lesion with ultrasound in 3 months is recommended" My provider set up a visit to a surgeon and I went today and he diagnosed Mondor's. So, I had never heard of it before and decided to read up on it. I am really confused about the conflicting opinions here. I have not had pain at the site, I have pain under my arm just under the armpit, but the area of the lump is pain free. If anyone can help, I would appreciate it. I am now being set up for a second opinion but wonders if anyone else has Mondor's that presented this way or knows what is going on.... Thanks!
This discussion is related to
Mondor's Disease.