Move along, you never had an exposure.
I become worried with your answer...
"It's true though,many HIV+ people don't have symptoms and are well for many years,then there are some that get symptoms.Everyones immune system is different."
What if a person for example who does an oral sex. What if he has an HIV and did not go testing and his body didn't show any symptoms. how many years can he detect that he has HIV?
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
Teak, call me fool.
I want to make it clear whether two months after the *possible* exposure (if there is) is too short for HIV-related mouth ulcers (not ARS) to show.
Is that correct?
Symptoms or the lack of never diagnoses HIV. You never had an exposure.
It's true though,many HIV+ people don't have symptoms and are well for many years,then there are some that get symptoms.Everyones immune system is different.
"The problem that doctors have is that alot of newly infected people never had any symptoms." that sounds advocate for the Japanese statement, which Teak disagrees.
I agree.If someone had a high risk exposure and then at around 2 to 4 weeks had high fevers and body rash then that person would most likely be experiencing ARS symptoms and therefore would likely test positive on a test.The problem that doctors have is that alot of newly infected people never had any symptoms.
I understand that. But things like "Fever at the second day after exposure cannot be ARS fever" helps.
And just like what you said: "HIV symptoms don't appear 2 months after exposure." The symptom is non-specific, but the timeline might help to filter out some cases.
It's because HIV has no specific symptoms.People have described flu like symptoms and hiv fevers as being symptoms that they experienced but it's to vague an issue to worry about.The reason is that symptoms won't diagnose HIV only testing will.
Thanks.
I think this is a useful information. Lots of articles and threads about ARS time range, few about HIV symptom timeline.
Somebody says HIV symptom starts to show at very late stage (1-4 years before AIDS), while some says there are symptom during the HIV asymptomatic stage (suck as mouth ulcers).
Probably we should shed more lights on this.
HIV symptoms don't appear 2 months after exposure.Your sex was protected so there is no way you were ever exposed to HIV.It would be a good idea to move on from this.
Thanks. Just cannot be that sure for what I did.
I know it is not ARS, but the question is whether this could be symptom after infected.
You never had a risk therefore the ulcers are not an issue.They are not ARS symptoms anyway.
Hi, Teak,
I don't think I have a risky situation (CSW, protected, even protected oral sex). But who knows whether I missed something or not?
Two months after the exposre, I started to have mouth ulcers, one by one. There have been like 4-5 ulcers till now. I knew I am a bit over-reacted. Just want to make sure these mouth ulcers have nothing to do with HIV. They are not ARS, and as to symptoms in HIV-positive patients, two months are too short, isn't it?
Regards,
Wrong forum.Dr HHH is in the expert doctors forum and you have to pay to receive his advice.Half way down on this page on the right click on Experts.
No that statement is mot correct. What was your possible exposure.