Here is a hypothetical situation. I have several cardiograms which I know belong to certain individual and they are all abnormal. Now, I have another cardiogram which is being claimed to be the same individual and it is normal. Is there any way to prove that the cardiogram indeed describes the same individual by using his abnormal cardiograms? The question can be inverted, namely, is there anyway to prove that "normal" cardiogram is fictitious. In other words, does any cardiogram contain certain set of numbers which can be interpreted like finger prints which are unique to a specific individual.