I have had Angina since the early 90s. About 4 years ago I had a mild Heart Attack, hospitalised 4 days, no damage sustained to Heart muscle. No tests at that time were carried out for cause.
2 years ago I asked to see a Cardiologist, various tests were undertaken, monitors, heart rate, tread mill all the usual test associated with this condition. Then about 18 months ago it was decided to do an Angiogram which showed I have a 90% blockage of the Right Coronary Artery: It also showed I have a small calibre R C Artery, which I was probably born with. Angioplasty was going to be performed then, but the Cardiologist decided the risk was too great and it was suggested not to do this unless the benefit outweighed the risk.
I saw the Cardiologist last December and 4 weeks ago when Angioplasty was discussed, and which they now want to carry out. I was told I am leaving myself open to a Heart Attack. My symptoms have not changed, and I take medication twice daily. What I don't understand is why they want to do it now when they were not prepared to do it 2 years ago, the risk as far as I can see is still the same.
I am unhappy about having it done and I have to admit a little afraid. I was told 2 years ago when diagnosed that because of the severity of the blockage and the small calibre of the artery, this reduced my odds from 1 in 100 to 1 in 10.
I would very much appreciate your input on this matter as I am having great difficulty in making a decision whether to have it done or not.
Thankyou