Spot on; that’s it exactly.
You’ll find LOG values reflect response more accurately; or at minimum paint a better picture of viral response during treatment. We’d think that when we drop from a viral load of say, fifty million to maybe ten million that it’d be very impressive; and it is, from a numerical perspective.
But, reviewing LOG value, we see that this translates as:
50,000,000 = LOG 7.7
10,000,000 = LOG 7.0
While reducing viral load by 40,000,000 sounds like a lot, 0.7 reduction is actually insignificant viewed from a logarithmic perspective, eh?
Bill
i figured it out;
it's the logarithmic representation of 964112 = 5.9841 log
so, i need to show a 2 log drop to continue treatment (once i start)
that would be 9641 = 3.9841
ahhh, now i get it.... :)