Aa
How MRI's Show MS Lesions
MY QUICK AND DIRTY EXPLANATION OF HOW MRI'S SHOW LESIONS IN MS
I am going to overexplain the MRI with contrast / without contrast thing again, so that you and your husband can have it as clear as possible in your minds.
MS does it's damage by causing the nerves in localized areas in the brain and spinal cord to lose their protective sheaths, called myelin. At first, when the myelin is being attacked, the body brings a higher blood supply to the area to fight the attack and the area becomes inflamed. These areas, now become lesions. At this point they are called "active lesions." At first the nerves haven't changed much and they appear (and have the same density) as the healthy areas around them. At this point after some time, probably months, the body CAN repair the damage and remyelinate the nerve. This repaired nerve still won't be as good as new, but the lesion "looks" like normal brain. Sometimes later an old scarred lesion will "reactivate" and the adjacent areas will inflame and have increased blood flow.
If the attack on the myelin sheath is too strong for the immune system to repair, more and more myelin disappears and the area of nerves eventually dies. Then it contracts and scars. The blood flow is decreased to that area and the area becomes "less dense" then the surrounding normal nerve tissue. After a longer time - probably years - the scar can reabsorb and the area becomes "empty." It's called a black hole.
When you image these lesions with an MRI you can see different things, depending on the technique,the age (stage) of the lesion, the power of the MRI, and whether contrast is used.
The first image is done without contrast. This technique will show old lesions that are big enough to be seen by the power of that MRI machine. WE KNOW that many lesions in MS are too small to be seen. If the newer, more powerful MRI with a 3 Tesla magnet is used many more lesions will be seen (by at least 25%) than on the older 1.5 Tesla machines. The classic old, mature MS lesion is a little bit oval, will have well-defined borders and will be in the white matter. Characteristic places are subcortical, peri-ventricular and in the corpus callosum. The classic MS lesion will also have it's long axis perpendicular to the ventricles of the brain. Also, important and very symptomatic lesions are found in the brainstem, the cervical and the thoracic spine. The spinal cord ends at the bottom of the thoracic spine, so there is no such thing as a lumbar spinal cord lesion in the normal spine.
These scarred lesions will show up as light, bright areas. These are the classic, MS lesions or "plaques."
Now the very old, scarred ones that have been reabsorbed will show up as a black (empty) space or black hole. If there are many of these empty areas the brain will contract around them eventually and show up as a loss of brain volume. This is also know as brain atrophy. This is particularly seen in the progressive types of MS.
However, a newly active MS lesion may not show up on a regular MRI because the area of nerves, though inflamed, is still pretty much intact and has normal brain density. On the MRI it will look like normal brain. Without contrast it won't show up and will be missed.
When the next phase of MRI is done the contrast is in the blood vessels. So the large blood vessels show up, too. Anywhere the tiny blood blood vessels are more dilated than usual, as in inlfammation, the areas will "highlight" or "enhance." They show up as even brighter. So new lesions will show up as enhancing, or active. Also, older lesions, that have undergone new attack right around them will show an enhancing rim or ring. When you compare the regular MRI to the Contrast MRI you can see this reactivated, old lesion.
That's how some reports can call active lesions or some report no newly enhancing lesions. Also since some new ones heal they can be compared to old films and show they disappeared. In addition, between different sets of MRI done after a time has passed, the radiologist can see an increase in old and in new activity.
Please ask question where I haven't been clear.
Quix
Thanks for the info. You went into great detail. Are you a nurse or in health care field or have you had MS for wahile, so you know these things?? I noticed alot of people post to you for advice. Glad there's someone with knowledge, who can help us. Thanks
Well, my first draft has some things missing in it and was originally part of an answer to EL48. So it reads a little weird. I edited it a bit and added a paragraph about the commonest lesion; the old, bright lesion.
MY QUICK AND DIRTY EXPLANATION OF HOW MRI'S SHOW LESIONS IN MS
MS does it's damage by causing the nerves in localized areas in the brain and spinal cord to lose their protective sheaths, called myelin. At first, when the myelin is being attacked, the body brings a higher blood supply to the area to fight the attack and the area becomes inflamed. These areas now become "lesions." At this point, when they are inflamed and blood engorged, they are called "active lesions." At first the nerves, themselves, haven't changed much and they appear (and have the same density) as the healthy areas around them. After some time, probably weeks to months, the body CAN repair the damage and remyelinate the nerve. This repaired nerve still won't be as good as new, but the lesion "looks" like normal brain. Sometimes later an old scarred lesion will "reactivate" and the adjacent areas will inflame and have increased blood flow as the renewed demyelination takes place.
If the nerves do not remyelinate and the damage continues, for a long time the lesions sit as scars. These scarred areas have damaged and dying cells in them, the blood supply shrinks, and the areas are not very dense - not as dense as the normal brain around them. These are the classic MS plaques and are considered old lesions.
If the attack on the myelin sheath is too strong for the immune system to repair, more and more myelin disappears and the area of nerves eventually dies. Then it contracts and scars. The blood flow is decreased to that area and the area becomes "less dense" then the surrounding normal nerve tissue. After a longer time - probably years - the scar can reabsorb and the area becomes "empty." It's called a black hole.
When you image these lesions with an MRI you can see different things, depending on the technique, the age (stage) of the lesion, the power of the MRI, and whether contrast is used.
The first image is done without contrast. This technique will show old lesions that are big enough to be seen by the power of that MRI machine. WE KNOW that many lesions in MS are too small to be seen. If the newer, more powerful MRI with a 3 Tesla magnet is used many more lesions will be seen (by at least 25%) than on the older 1.5 Tesla machines. The classic old, mature MS lesion is a little bit oval, will have well-defined borders and will be in the white matter. Characteristic places are subcortical, peri-ventricular and in the corpus callosum. The classic MS lesion will also have it's long axis perpendicular to the ventricles of the brain. Also, important and very symptomatic lesions are found in the brainstem, the cervical and the thoracic spine. The spinal cord ends at the bottom of the thoracic spine, so there is no such thing as a lumbar spinal cord lesion in the normal spine.
The scarred lesions will show up as light, bright areas. These are the classic, MS lesions or "plaques." But, with just the regular MRI one can NOT say if it is old and dormant or if it has active inflammation in it.
Now the very old, scarred ones that have been reabsorbed will show up as a black (empty) space or black hole. If there are many of these empty areas the brain will contract around them eventually and show up as a loss of brain volume. This is also know as brain atrophy. This is particularly seen in the progressive types of MS.
However, a newly active MS lesion may not show up on a regular MRI because the area of nerves, though inflamed, is still pretty much intact and has normal brain density. On the MRI it will look like normal brain. Without contrast it won't show up and will be missed.
When the next phase of MRI is done the contrast is in the blood vessels. So the large blood vessels show up, too. Anywhere the blood vessels are more dilated than usual, bringing more blood to the area, as in inlfammation, the areas will "highlight" or "enhance." They show up as even brighter than the brain around them and brighter than an old, scarred lesion. So new lesions will show up as enhancing, or active. Also, older lesions, that have undergone new attack right around them will show an enhancing rim or ring. When you compare the regular MRI to the Contrast MRI you can see this reactivated, old lesion.
That's how some reports can call active lesions or some report no newly enhancing lesions. Also since some new ones heal they can be compared to old films and show they disappeared. In addition, between different sets of MRI done after a time has passed, the radiologist can see an increase in old and in new activity.
Please ask question where I haven't been clear.
Quix
MY QUICK AND DIRTY EXPLANATION OF HOW MRI'S SHOW LESIONS IN MS
MS does it's damage by causing the nerves in localized areas in the brain and spinal cord to lose their protective sheaths, called myelin. At first, when the myelin is being attacked, the body brings a higher blood supply to the area to fight the attack and the area becomes inflamed. These areas now become "lesions." At this point, when they are inflamed and blood engorged, they are called "active lesions." At first the nerves, themselves, haven't changed much and they appear (and have the same density) as the healthy areas around them. After some time, probably weeks to months, the body CAN repair the damage and remyelinate the nerve. This repaired nerve still won't be as good as new, but the lesion "looks" like normal brain. Sometimes later an old scarred lesion will "reactivate" and the adjacent areas will inflame and have increased blood flow as the renewed demyelination takes place.
If the nerves do not remyelinate and the damage continues, for a long time the lesions sit as scars. These scarred areas have damaged and dying cells in them, the blood supply shrinks, and the areas are not very dense - not as dense as the normal brain around them. These are the classic MS plaques and are considered old lesions.
If the attack on the myelin sheath is too strong for the immune system to repair, more and more myelin disappears and the area of nerves eventually dies. Then it contracts and scars. The blood flow is decreased to that area and the area becomes "less dense" then the surrounding normal nerve tissue. After a longer time - probably years - the scar can reabsorb and the area becomes "empty." It's called a black hole.
When you image these lesions with an MRI you can see different things, depending on the technique, the age (stage) of the lesion, the power of the MRI, and whether contrast is used.
The first image is done without contrast. This technique will show old lesions that are big enough to be seen by the power of that MRI machine. WE KNOW that many lesions in MS are too small to be seen. If the newer, more powerful MRI with a 3 Tesla magnet is used many more lesions will be seen (by at least 25%) than on the older 1.5 Tesla machines. The classic old, mature MS lesion is a little bit oval, will have well-defined borders and will be in the white matter. Characteristic places are subcortical, peri-ventricular and in the corpus callosum. The classic MS lesion will also have it's long axis perpendicular to the ventricles of the brain. Also, important and very symptomatic lesions are found in the brainstem, the cervical and the thoracic spine. The spinal cord ends at the bottom of the thoracic spine, so there is no such thing as a lumbar spinal cord lesion in the normal spine.
The scarred lesions will show up as light, bright areas. These are the classic, MS lesions or "plaques." But, with just the regular MRI one can NOT say if it is old and dormant or if it has active inflammation in it.
Now the very old, scarred ones that have been reabsorbed will show up as a black (empty) space or black hole. If there are many of these empty areas the brain will contract around them eventually and show up as a loss of brain volume. This is also know as brain atrophy. This is particularly seen in the progressive types of MS.
However, a newly active MS lesion may not show up on a regular MRI because the area of nerves, though inflamed, is still pretty much intact and has normal brain density. On the MRI it will look like normal brain. Without contrast it won't show up and will be missed.
When the next phase of MRI is done the contrast is in the blood vessels. So the large blood vessels show up, too. Anywhere the blood vessels are more dilated than usual, bringing more blood to the area, as in inlfammation, the areas will "highlight" or "enhance." They show up as even brighter than the brain around them and brighter than an old, scarred lesion. So new lesions will show up as enhancing, or active. Also, older lesions, that have undergone new attack right around them will show an enhancing rim or ring. When you compare the regular MRI to the Contrast MRI you can see this reactivated, old lesion.
That's how some reports can call active lesions or some report no newly enhancing lesions. Also since some new ones heal they can be compared to old films and show they disappeared. In addition, between different sets of MRI done after a time has passed, the radiologist can see an increase in old and in new activity.
Please ask question where I haven't been clear.
Quix
Hi, I didn't realize that you didn't know I am a physician. I was a pediatrician for 23 years, disabled by vertigo about 6 years ago and diagnosed with MS 5 months ago after having an "evil" and nasty neurologist ignore my symptoms and misread my MRI's for a couple of years. I spend time here trying to help people make sense of what might be happening to them and trying to help people get around doctors who dismiss their complaints as psychosomatic.
Being here helps me feel useful. It's both a selfish thing and a way to keep my years of education from going to waste. My story is on the thread on this page called "What I Went Through to Get a Diagnosis of MS."
Quix
Being here helps me feel useful. It's both a selfish thing and a way to keep my years of education from going to waste. My story is on the thread on this page called "What I Went Through to Get a Diagnosis of MS."
Quix
Very interesting reading. What would you do if your neurologist disagreed with the radiologist MRI report?
The radiologist says my MRI shows demylenation. The neurologist says the spots are from blood pressure, which has been controlled for years with medication. She said the spots are not the right shape or in the right spot.
They are in the right posterior frontal subcortical white matter. Oh, and my MRI was done on a Telsa 1. Sorry if I have asked this before....can't remember! Who do I trust?
LATW
The radiologist says my MRI shows demylenation. The neurologist says the spots are from blood pressure, which has been controlled for years with medication. She said the spots are not the right shape or in the right spot.
They are in the right posterior frontal subcortical white matter. Oh, and my MRI was done on a Telsa 1. Sorry if I have asked this before....can't remember! Who do I trust?
LATW
I was told by my neurologist at the Mayo Clinic that the damage I have cannot be repaired. He said that the myelin could not repair itself. I know that I probably missunderstood him but my whole family understood it the same way. Is this right or wrong?
One more question please, A test of the paraneoplastic autoantibody screen showed elevated ganglionic acetylcholine receptor antibodies. The level was 0.05 with the normal being 0.02 or below. What does this mean and how would it effect me? I don't know if it even has anything to do with the MRI's or not but it was written underneath my MRI report.
Thank you for everything,
Carol
One more question please, A test of the paraneoplastic autoantibody screen showed elevated ganglionic acetylcholine receptor antibodies. The level was 0.05 with the normal being 0.02 or below. What does this mean and how would it effect me? I don't know if it even has anything to do with the MRI's or not but it was written underneath my MRI report.
Thank you for everything,
Carol
Thanks so much Quix!! Great info! Very concise and informative! :)
A question for you ~ what is the difference between T1, T2 and FLAIR? My neuro said the FLAIR images were best to look at when we were viewing my films.
Have a great evening! Pat :)
A question for you ~ what is the difference between T1, T2 and FLAIR? My neuro said the FLAIR images were best to look at when we were viewing my films.
Have a great evening! Pat :)
Thank you for the info, it's amazing.
I just had one more question. I have small white circular dots all over my MRI films/pictures, not sure what to call them. Do you know what those could be? I know I'm going to the doctor soon, and will find out, but it kind of bugs me to see on the film. And I"m just curious by nature.
I just had one more question. I have small white circular dots all over my MRI films/pictures, not sure what to call them. Do you know what those could be? I know I'm going to the doctor soon, and will find out, but it kind of bugs me to see on the film. And I"m just curious by nature.
Could you please take a look at my posting about my test results when you get a chance please? I'm not wanting you to interpret anything, just want your opinion on my neurologist. I hope you are doing well, and look forward to hearing from you.
Jenn
Jenn
Thank you so much for the above MRI/Lesion explanation - it's so thorough, helpful and written in a way that can be understood and retained.
Very interesting info where do you find the time to do all this research your amazing!!
Iv got my scan on the 14th of August and i am so worried they will miss something im already getting worked up that this will not show something and im on a long journey to find out whats wrong!!
Iv cut and pasted the info as off to spend some time with my husbands parnets as finding it hard to look after kids as feeling rough so will read it in more detail when i get back.
Iv got my scan on the 14th of August and i am so worried they will miss something im already getting worked up that this will not show something and im on a long journey to find out whats wrong!!
Iv cut and pasted the info as off to spend some time with my husbands parnets as finding it hard to look after kids as feeling rough so will read it in more detail when i get back.
I'm wondering if you could comment on my situation.
I went to the ER because I was very dizzy. I have high blood pressure and suspected it was up (I had not been taking my meds for a long time - bad, I know). Blood pressure was up - 184/126. They did a CT to see if I had a stroke. No stroke, but the CT showed "brain atrophy." My primary physician ordered an MRI.
My MRI report says, "In the periventricular deep white matter are multiple abnormal bright T2 and FLAIR weighted foci, which do not appear to contrast enhance. Their location and appearance is suspicious for demylenating disorder, such as multiple sclerosis. The rest of the brain appeared unremarkable. There are no contrast enhancing lesions. Posterior fossa appeared unremarkable. Brain stem appeared normal. Seventh adn eighth cranial nerves appeared unremarkable. The parasellar region appeared normal."
I have an appointment to see a neurologist on 8/20. In the meantime, I can't help but wonder if there's any chance what they're seeing could be indicative of ALS, since my mother died from ALS. I guess what confuses me about what the MRI report says is where it says "there are no contrast enhancing lesions." I thought with MS they were supposed to see lesions on the MRI - or is the report saying there are lesions, but they do not contrast enhance?
Anyway, any thoughts you have are appreciated, and you are doing such a wonderful thing here - definitely using your education for good. Many thanks.
I went to the ER because I was very dizzy. I have high blood pressure and suspected it was up (I had not been taking my meds for a long time - bad, I know). Blood pressure was up - 184/126. They did a CT to see if I had a stroke. No stroke, but the CT showed "brain atrophy." My primary physician ordered an MRI.
My MRI report says, "In the periventricular deep white matter are multiple abnormal bright T2 and FLAIR weighted foci, which do not appear to contrast enhance. Their location and appearance is suspicious for demylenating disorder, such as multiple sclerosis. The rest of the brain appeared unremarkable. There are no contrast enhancing lesions. Posterior fossa appeared unremarkable. Brain stem appeared normal. Seventh adn eighth cranial nerves appeared unremarkable. The parasellar region appeared normal."
I have an appointment to see a neurologist on 8/20. In the meantime, I can't help but wonder if there's any chance what they're seeing could be indicative of ALS, since my mother died from ALS. I guess what confuses me about what the MRI report says is where it says "there are no contrast enhancing lesions." I thought with MS they were supposed to see lesions on the MRI - or is the report saying there are lesions, but they do not contrast enhance?
Anyway, any thoughts you have are appreciated, and you are doing such a wonderful thing here - definitely using your education for good. Many thanks.
I have a few more thoughts to add to my previous post - sorry to be a pest. I don't really think I have any symptoms. I play drums, and have experienced no lack of coordination. I'm a secretary, so I practically type for a living - no new problems there. I do have trouble standing from a seated position, feeling like my legs aren't going to support my weight, but I've passed that off as I'm just too **** fat and I don't excercise, so of course my legs are weak. I can't stand for very long without "concentrating" to do it, and then I still feel tired or achy in my leg muscles, but again, just too fat? I do get cramps in my legs frequently, but I figure that's dehydration (I don't drink enough water, that's for sure - working on that some), or low potassium, so I eat a banana (or, oddly, eating a dill pickle seems to help). On a positive note, I moved into the second floor of an apartment building a few weeks ago, and since being there have found that I can take the stairs easier than before, which leads me to sort of rule out ALS because if I had lost muscle I wouldn't be able to build it up again if it was ALS. Can you build muscle when you have MS? Of course, I'm hoping the diagnosis is not ALS or MS, but perhaps just that I'm too fat, but then, why the brain atrophy on the MRI? Again, thanks for taking the time to read all these posts and to give your opinion. It is much appreciated.
Hi, Welcome to the forum!! You have found the right place, but sort of posted in a place where not many people would find you. Would you copy your posts above, adding anything you want to them (more info is better than no info)? You will have your own thread and we all can talk to you better.
Quick answer because I know you're worried. No NOTHING in what you posted sounds like ALS. And no, you CANNOT rebuild weakened muscle in ALS.
Talk to you more after you post on the main forum page. If you are reading this, then right at the bottom of the page is a blue button "Back to Forum." Click on that and then at the top of the page click on "Post a Question." The paste in your two posts and we will flock to your side.
Quix
Quick answer because I know you're worried. No NOTHING in what you posted sounds like ALS. And no, you CANNOT rebuild weakened muscle in ALS.
Talk to you more after you post on the main forum page. If you are reading this, then right at the bottom of the page is a blue button "Back to Forum." Click on that and then at the top of the page click on "Post a Question." The paste in your two posts and we will flock to your side.
Quix
Karina - I misread your name long ago and have repeated the mistake many times since. I'm so sorry! Glad to have you back posting regularly.
LATW - You definitely need a tiebreaker - or two. If you look at my post above you'll see that I had a radiologist and my neurologist misread two of My brain MRI's. One went to great lengths to say that he would mention my 1cm, well-defined, oval bright spot (Called a UBO- Unidentified Bright Object) ONLY for the sake of completeness and that it was normal for age. My "evil" neuro looked at it and emphasized that they didn't know what caused UBO's but that they were insignificant. They were both wrong. In the face of neurological symptoms NO lesion can be dismissed. Yes, typical lesions in MS have a characteristic pattern and shape. Yours don't. This lessens the likelihood of MS, but does NOT RULE IT OUT! Get thee to a good second opinion.
One place to get the names of Doc's that see a lot of MS patients is to attend a local support group (though often they don't meet in the summer because of the heat) but they will tell you who is compassionate, who is smart and who they've dumped. We are a vocal crowd, lol
You need another evaluation, including a thorough neuro exam (Momzilla can now tell you what a thorough exam looks like) and a new opinion. A 1Tesla machine won't show nearly the true number or shape of MS lesions. Make sure you are not mixing up the MRI report which talks about T1-weighted images. This is not talking about the strength of the MRI magnet, but of an imaging technique. If, indeed, your images were on that old a machine, discuss with the new MS specialist repeating the images on a newer, more powerful machine.
If you go this route I again highly recommend a concise timeline!!
CAROL! - I hope you see this. What your doctors told you is correct. Your lesions were old, scarred and some were becoming black holes, I think. No, Once they get to the bright stage seen without enhancement, I do not think that they can heal, because by then they are scars. I do not think they think you have relapsing-remitting. That is the category that can see some healing and resolution of lesions.
Lesions that heal - These are seen only in Relapsing-Remitting MS - RRMS. They correspond to the relapses which can be so dramatic as to involve blindness or paralysis, but then over time the symptoms may completely disappear. This is due to a lesion who had damaged myelin, but that the body was fairly successful at remyelinating. Again, studies show that the "remyelinated" nerves are not as good as new. Their nerve signal conduction remains a little slower and they are more fragile. But those lesions which caused that relapse may disappear within a few months.
Carol - I don't know much about the paraneoplastic syndromes. On my next foray into looking things up I'll check out that antibody. Sorry. You need to tell us how you are doing on the new treatment? How ARE you doing?
Pat - Boy! I was really hoping you would not ask that PARTICULAR question! Arggghh... Okay, I was looking up for a good description and didn't readily come across an easy one. I did find a thorough discussion of the T1 - T2 topic. It is a deeply scientific matter of mathematics and physics and trying to read it made my brain hurt! :( So, I will describe what I understood. Where the stuff is really technical (ie. I don't understand it) I will just refer to the "miracle.
The T1-weighted images and the T2-weighted images refer to the different rates and strengths of the electromagnetic pulse that is sent through the body to the receiver. There are long-strong pulses, short-strong pulses and long and short weak pulses. In a miracle the machine and the programmers use these different pulse/spin sequences to make the different tissue structures in the body stand out from each other. In the 20+ years of studying the miracle they have discovered that different tissues (brain, bone, liver, blood, etc) all show up best using different pulse techniques. Many of these have to do with that tissue was compared to water, They have also discovered that certain combinations of techniques show abnormalities like tumors or scars or whatever. That's it, folks. I can't get any better than that. I do know that T1 images show the CSF to be white and the brain medium and the bone black. T2 (which I think are the most commonly displayed) show the bone to be white, the brain medium gray, and the CSF to be black. (they are flip-flops or positive/negative of one another) But the computer, during a miracle, compares these two and further delineates (distinguishes) things that weren't really apparent on either type image alone.
The FLAIR is a little easier for me, but still involves a miracle happening. It stands for FLuid Attenuated Inversion Recovery. It is another miracle of pulses and signals. It's purpose is to distinguish things that border on ares of fluid (mostly for our purpose - CSF). Apparently a lesion right up against the ventricles can blur out and be missed. The FLAIR technique recovers information and through a miracle makes the lesion show up. There! Here is the link that made my brain hurt:
http://spinwarp.ucsd.edu/neuroweb/Text/br-100.htm
Hi Corinne - I can't picture little white dots. So sorry, I will answer your question that you posted, though a little later. I have to bring up your old posts and reread them to see. I don't keep my opinions active (I don't remember them later) as I talk to people. I can't keep that much in my head and I've already, in three months here, learned how often I'm wrong (lots).
And finally:
LATW - No "enhancing" lesions means there are no "new" (6 weeks or less old) lesions that enhanced because of increase blow flow (inflammation) to them. It doesn't mean there were no lesions.
Quix - Out for the count!
LATW - You definitely need a tiebreaker - or two. If you look at my post above you'll see that I had a radiologist and my neurologist misread two of My brain MRI's. One went to great lengths to say that he would mention my 1cm, well-defined, oval bright spot (Called a UBO- Unidentified Bright Object) ONLY for the sake of completeness and that it was normal for age. My "evil" neuro looked at it and emphasized that they didn't know what caused UBO's but that they were insignificant. They were both wrong. In the face of neurological symptoms NO lesion can be dismissed. Yes, typical lesions in MS have a characteristic pattern and shape. Yours don't. This lessens the likelihood of MS, but does NOT RULE IT OUT! Get thee to a good second opinion.
One place to get the names of Doc's that see a lot of MS patients is to attend a local support group (though often they don't meet in the summer because of the heat) but they will tell you who is compassionate, who is smart and who they've dumped. We are a vocal crowd, lol
You need another evaluation, including a thorough neuro exam (Momzilla can now tell you what a thorough exam looks like) and a new opinion. A 1Tesla machine won't show nearly the true number or shape of MS lesions. Make sure you are not mixing up the MRI report which talks about T1-weighted images. This is not talking about the strength of the MRI magnet, but of an imaging technique. If, indeed, your images were on that old a machine, discuss with the new MS specialist repeating the images on a newer, more powerful machine.
If you go this route I again highly recommend a concise timeline!!
CAROL! - I hope you see this. What your doctors told you is correct. Your lesions were old, scarred and some were becoming black holes, I think. No, Once they get to the bright stage seen without enhancement, I do not think that they can heal, because by then they are scars. I do not think they think you have relapsing-remitting. That is the category that can see some healing and resolution of lesions.
Lesions that heal - These are seen only in Relapsing-Remitting MS - RRMS. They correspond to the relapses which can be so dramatic as to involve blindness or paralysis, but then over time the symptoms may completely disappear. This is due to a lesion who had damaged myelin, but that the body was fairly successful at remyelinating. Again, studies show that the "remyelinated" nerves are not as good as new. Their nerve signal conduction remains a little slower and they are more fragile. But those lesions which caused that relapse may disappear within a few months.
Carol - I don't know much about the paraneoplastic syndromes. On my next foray into looking things up I'll check out that antibody. Sorry. You need to tell us how you are doing on the new treatment? How ARE you doing?
Pat - Boy! I was really hoping you would not ask that PARTICULAR question! Arggghh... Okay, I was looking up for a good description and didn't readily come across an easy one. I did find a thorough discussion of the T1 - T2 topic. It is a deeply scientific matter of mathematics and physics and trying to read it made my brain hurt! :( So, I will describe what I understood. Where the stuff is really technical (ie. I don't understand it) I will just refer to the "miracle.
The T1-weighted images and the T2-weighted images refer to the different rates and strengths of the electromagnetic pulse that is sent through the body to the receiver. There are long-strong pulses, short-strong pulses and long and short weak pulses. In a miracle the machine and the programmers use these different pulse/spin sequences to make the different tissue structures in the body stand out from each other. In the 20+ years of studying the miracle they have discovered that different tissues (brain, bone, liver, blood, etc) all show up best using different pulse techniques. Many of these have to do with that tissue was compared to water, They have also discovered that certain combinations of techniques show abnormalities like tumors or scars or whatever. That's it, folks. I can't get any better than that. I do know that T1 images show the CSF to be white and the brain medium and the bone black. T2 (which I think are the most commonly displayed) show the bone to be white, the brain medium gray, and the CSF to be black. (they are flip-flops or positive/negative of one another) But the computer, during a miracle, compares these two and further delineates (distinguishes) things that weren't really apparent on either type image alone.
The FLAIR is a little easier for me, but still involves a miracle happening. It stands for FLuid Attenuated Inversion Recovery. It is another miracle of pulses and signals. It's purpose is to distinguish things that border on ares of fluid (mostly for our purpose - CSF). Apparently a lesion right up against the ventricles can blur out and be missed. The FLAIR technique recovers information and through a miracle makes the lesion show up. There! Here is the link that made my brain hurt:
http://spinwarp.ucsd.edu/neuroweb/Text/br-100.htm
Hi Corinne - I can't picture little white dots. So sorry, I will answer your question that you posted, though a little later. I have to bring up your old posts and reread them to see. I don't keep my opinions active (I don't remember them later) as I talk to people. I can't keep that much in my head and I've already, in three months here, learned how often I'm wrong (lots).
And finally:
LATW - No "enhancing" lesions means there are no "new" (6 weeks or less old) lesions that enhanced because of increase blow flow (inflammation) to them. It doesn't mean there were no lesions.
Quix - Out for the count!
Quick and Dirty. Someone on this forum is FINALLY speaking my language. I knew someone was going to let their hair down after a while.....And I had a feeling it would be the doctor. Ya Hoo!
I had to read it a few times, but I am getting the "picture." Thanks for painting it so well. I love the miracle metaphor. It's like magic, right? Some kind of holy smoke happens in there? Give me a few more weeks on my fish oil (supposed to help with cognitive function) and it just may click completely.
You da man, Girl!
Zilla*
I had to read it a few times, but I am getting the "picture." Thanks for painting it so well. I love the miracle metaphor. It's like magic, right? Some kind of holy smoke happens in there? Give me a few more weeks on my fish oil (supposed to help with cognitive function) and it just may click completely.
You da man, Girl!
Zilla*
I was just wondering if anyone knew how early in the disease process lesions would show up on CT? I have numerous symptoms of MS but my CT came back clean. Currently I have all these symptoms and no diagnosis.
It would depend on how large the lesions are. If the areas of damage are new they could show within the first month, but most lesions are in the brain and most brain lesions don't cause symptoms, so it would have to be a lucky coincidence. By the time a person has their first attack, and is diagnosed on MRI they typically have several old lesions already.
Quix
Quix
Hi -
I began to notice numbness and tingling, on my right side. When it was just my hand and arm to elbow, I attributed to carpal tunnel and cervical disk due to previous 2000 MVA. However, when it went to leg, foot to knee, same side/same time, I sought immediate medical treatment with my PCP. CT was WNL. MRI/MRA showed 3 lesions, done w/o contrast. Repeat 4 weeks later with contrast showed enhancing lesion in one area. Continued with tingling/numbness/spider on the face sensation, mostly on right side (lesions on the left). On 07/12 was hospitalized with acute loss of function on right side. Uncontrollable shaking in R leg and arm. Short term memory loss. Was hospitalized 6 days, high dose IV steroids, LP done, standard EEG and EP EEG (found to be inconclusive???) Was not able to track to the left. Regained function on right side after 2 days and gait resumed. Repeat MRI w/3 Tesla showed one new lesion (Doctors had all my previous records). Drs. suspicious for MS, but not convinced yet. LP fluid final studies showed I met the minimal requirements for MS based on Mayo Clinic standards. Since home, still with balance problems. Stand up and close eyes will tip, pivoting or quick movement makes me lose balance and fall into furniture, etc. Have acute jaw tightness. Hard to open enough to eat, yawn, speak. Put on Baclofan TID, and tapered as tolerated. However, after getting down to 2 Balofan per week, am now back up to BID to TID as the pain, tightness/spasm back. Also having leg spasms that wake me at night. I have been exercising on my stationary bicycle BID but don't see any improvement. When I go back in time, things make more sense, for whatever illness I have, as I was in very minor MVA in 12/06, and ended up in ICU with loss of function in right leg and put on high dose steroids with improvement and then home PT, regained function. Then in March 07 taken to ER for uncontrolled shaking on right side, but never followed up on. I am worried that I may have MS, but even more concerned for ALS, as I am doing all the things I feel are right, but not really getting better. Also, I find myself going into a room trying to remember why I am there. I failed to mention, I am only 42. Any insight from anyone would be appreciated. I have a great neurologist, and he is cautious and treating me symptomatically and watchful waiting - will repeat MRI in Sept. He has me home on disability at least through September 07, but I hate to bug him continuouly about my concerns. I called him 2 weeks ago when I woke up w/loss of vision and pain in my right eye, which returned in 48 hours, but that was scary and he and I did talk then.
Thanks in advance to anyone who can respond. I am the mother of 2 boys, 8/10 y/o and the oldest has Asperger Syndrome. I need to try and understand what is happening to me, as being healthy for them is of great significance to me.
JoNoMom
I began to notice numbness and tingling, on my right side. When it was just my hand and arm to elbow, I attributed to carpal tunnel and cervical disk due to previous 2000 MVA. However, when it went to leg, foot to knee, same side/same time, I sought immediate medical treatment with my PCP. CT was WNL. MRI/MRA showed 3 lesions, done w/o contrast. Repeat 4 weeks later with contrast showed enhancing lesion in one area. Continued with tingling/numbness/spider on the face sensation, mostly on right side (lesions on the left). On 07/12 was hospitalized with acute loss of function on right side. Uncontrollable shaking in R leg and arm. Short term memory loss. Was hospitalized 6 days, high dose IV steroids, LP done, standard EEG and EP EEG (found to be inconclusive???) Was not able to track to the left. Regained function on right side after 2 days and gait resumed. Repeat MRI w/3 Tesla showed one new lesion (Doctors had all my previous records). Drs. suspicious for MS, but not convinced yet. LP fluid final studies showed I met the minimal requirements for MS based on Mayo Clinic standards. Since home, still with balance problems. Stand up and close eyes will tip, pivoting or quick movement makes me lose balance and fall into furniture, etc. Have acute jaw tightness. Hard to open enough to eat, yawn, speak. Put on Baclofan TID, and tapered as tolerated. However, after getting down to 2 Balofan per week, am now back up to BID to TID as the pain, tightness/spasm back. Also having leg spasms that wake me at night. I have been exercising on my stationary bicycle BID but don't see any improvement. When I go back in time, things make more sense, for whatever illness I have, as I was in very minor MVA in 12/06, and ended up in ICU with loss of function in right leg and put on high dose steroids with improvement and then home PT, regained function. Then in March 07 taken to ER for uncontrolled shaking on right side, but never followed up on. I am worried that I may have MS, but even more concerned for ALS, as I am doing all the things I feel are right, but not really getting better. Also, I find myself going into a room trying to remember why I am there. I failed to mention, I am only 42. Any insight from anyone would be appreciated. I have a great neurologist, and he is cautious and treating me symptomatically and watchful waiting - will repeat MRI in Sept. He has me home on disability at least through September 07, but I hate to bug him continuouly about my concerns. I called him 2 weeks ago when I woke up w/loss of vision and pain in my right eye, which returned in 48 hours, but that was scary and he and I did talk then.
Thanks in advance to anyone who can respond. I am the mother of 2 boys, 8/10 y/o and the oldest has Asperger Syndrome. I need to try and understand what is happening to me, as being healthy for them is of great significance to me.
JoNoMom
No nasty comments from real MRI techs who understand this stuff! lol. Believe me, it's a miracle!. Q
Jazzy and Harrie -
This may help w/the Lesion Healing question you posted - it explains the demyl and remylenating process really well. . . .
This may help w/the Lesion Healing question you posted - it explains the demyl and remylenating process really well. . . .
Have an Answer?
You are reading content posted in the Multiple Sclerosis Community
Top Neurology Answerers
Australia
ON
Queensland, Australia
Queen Creek, AZ
Find out how beta-blocker eye drops show promising results for acute migraine relief.
In this special Missouri Medicine report, doctors examine advances in diagnosis and treatment of this devastating and costly neurodegenerative disease.
Here are 12 simple – and fun! – ways to boost your brainpower.
Discover some of the causes of dizziness and how to treat it.
Discover the common causes of headaches and how to treat headache pain.
Two of the largest studies on Alzheimer’s have yielded new clues about the disease
