I appreciate your arguement, but truthfully I think I'm making the right decision. I truely believe I am progressive rather than RR and you know as well as I that there are no DMDs for progressive.
The MS thing is estimated guesses and Yes it does pay to be conservative and to take the DMDs. I would absolutely take them if I believed I was RR.
You know that statisically older onset (me), male (me) and first symptoms are motor (me) have a tendency to be progressive or go to progressive quicker.
I don't think that I'm too far out there taking this position,
Jon
Hey,
Nice to see you. I've been off of it a couple times now one reason including low WBC and have to say you are very right. Though we need it, the time off does shed a lot of light on exactly how much we tolerate while on it. Not everyone obviously, but some, including me. Had I not went without it I'd have chalked all of it up to the disease.
I'll be honest here, I dilly dallied returning to full dose partly for the temptation you speak of - MS symptoms aside, I simply 'felt' I felt better without it (and w/the lower dose even). It is risky, like you say, making that choice. Do we think of the here and now, or the future? You know, like buying something now when you don't have the extra money, instead saving it or putting it away for later golden yrs. Ok, that's probably not the best example, but think you know what I mean. Daily living, vs long term results.
Ok, back to you here. Question for you, are you welcoming the progression so it doesn't "show up" and surprise you? Or, knock you down when you least expect it? I know you are feeling it gradually, but maybe, like you say, the med has been protecting you and keeping things milder.
You know I'd not hollar at or scold you for your decisions my friend, just giving it to you straight like I know you would me. When you are ready, maybe we can talk rebif, and sub-q and smaller dosing and compromises.
ttys,
shell