A friend of mine reminded me that Nancy grace is a former prosecutor to whom the word," Innocent," does not exist. At no time, that I can recall, has she considered the possibility that anyone could be innocent. In the case of Caylee she might very well be right because the evidence is there. In other cases that she has sensationalized on her show no one has ever been considered innocent. This is because she picks and chooses what events she will use on her show. Innocence can not be sensationalized because innocence is boring. She therefore looks, or has her staff look, for a 99% guilty perpetrator that she can tie up the airwaves with and create points for the network she represents. She is trying to convince the already ,"Convinced," that apples are apples and pears are pears, a fact or two that we already know. The point is, don't tell us what we already know and try to brainwash us into thinking it was her idea in the first place. If she wants to peak my interest to the fullest, she should come up with something I don't know or suspect. Let her show me an orange and convince me it is a grape.