I'm a 23 year old guy, I posted on here 3 years ago (Dr John Hagan might remember).It started 3 years ago at a annual eye check up, my eye-pressure on a puff-test measured 21-22. This sparked a 3 year chain of ''worrying over glaucoma''. I then preceded to a retinal specialist whos 'assistant' with a puff-test (99% sure it was a 'tono-pen puff tester), which measured 27-27! This made my heart sink and a month later I went to a Glaucoma specialist who on a Goldmann measured both eyes at 16-17, and then nearly two years later (corona-virus extended my re-test), I once again measured 16-17, and all through those two years ever 3-4 months I went to a optometrist (a friend/referra of the glaucoma specialist) who on a machine (not a goldmann but not a hand held tester?) measured around 16-18 every time.
I was given the all clear after numerous test and two thorough glaucoma specialist exams plus the constant reassurance from the friend/referral optometrist. There has always always been one thing I never asked and I wish I did, so here I am. My cornea thickness is 600-615+ in both my eyes, which I was told is why I got a ''inaccurate measurement'' from the very beggining and ''if they had a goldmann I would of never have been in that spiral of test. Now to my question I hope to god I can figure out, even if my eye pressure takes 4-5 off the 'cornea conversion', why did that assistant ever measure 27? Did I squeeze, was I stressed? How come that one time it measured so high - it's still regarded as around 23 if the conversion strips it, but still? out of every single test, only that one ever hit over 20+?. Is it safe to say the puff test can throw the measurements way way off? I know this sounds so silly backtracking, this was all cleared nearly a year ago now... I just wish I had asked what it meant as in the doctors minds I was ''all fine'' but as a 23 year old patient, I got no clue what I'm honestly being told so it just concerns me..