thanks iommi, is this because within 6 weeks
even if you havent had hardly any symptoms
there still should be some kind of small amount of detectable antibodies
that would show on the test after 43 days ?
well I got tested yesterday which woulda been 43 days since possible
exposure, and it came back negative. I didnt know the name of the test
but it was 2 vials taken out of arm of blood , did glance at the sheet
and it said (rapid) , and the doctor said its a very sensitive test.
So everything is ok then ?
surprised no one else has commented????
vaginal fluids enter the urethra when unprotected, your abrasion doesn't sound like a concern.
Try avoid over analyzing this, it will fuel anxiety.
Test asap as advised, a negative now is more likely a true indication of your status.
Thanks for answering iommi, what I dont understand is if small
Ammount got through the cut/skin burn , wouldnt the body be able to
Fight off / kill off such a low ammount without it progressing ?
And also wondering
What percent of women have hiv in the united states ?
You are correct about the female to male transmission, none the less this was a risk.
If you can get a 4th gen test for a conclusive result or a 3rd gen at this time would be a great indicator of your status.
Unprotected sex is a risk for other possible STDs, you may want to play it safe and test beyond hiv.
Your symptoms aren't classic for hiv, besides hiv symptoms mirror other things.
To be more clear the friction burns (kinda carpet burn like)
Was from someone who was def hiv negative
It was only one abrasion the was about a half inch long
But it def still caused discomfort and was created only 24
Hours before the 1 minute of unprotected sex which has
Me worried to death at this moment (since diarrhea showed up)