There are a lot more blood-borne pathogens that are not as fragile as HIV. Plus you do not want to be transferring something from one patent to another.
So why do medical professionals tell us to wear gloves when working with someone infected who has a cut? That's what I can't figure out. if it can't transmit like that then we shouldn't have to wear gloves.
Hiv is no longer infectious once outside the body in any bodily fluids because it becomes damaged once exposed to air.
HIV is unable to reproduce outside its living host (unlike many bacteria or fungi, which may do so under suitable conditions), except under laboratory conditions; therefore, it does not spread or maintain infectiousness outside its host.
But isn't HIV transmitted by blood? So if there were blood in the feces couldn't that have some HIV in it?