sorry, I did move on until the doctor told me that there was a risk. I'm moving on the best I can now. I guess that the doctor I saw must not have been an expert. I just thought it was weird that doctors here said they've never seen a documented case of HIV via oral whereas my doctor at the university health center said she has. I did not mean to re ask the same questions about my risk, I really just wanted to hear what you guys thought about what my doctor said. I'm glad to hear that my doctor was wrong. Now that I think about it, she did seem to close her eyes when she would tell me about HIV risks, like she couldn't look me in the eyes and say it.
It won't and you didn't. Move on.
The doctor I saw was a university heath service sexual health doctor. She seemed like she knew what she was talking about, but I doubt she specialized in HIV. She just acted like it was totally possible that I contracted HIV, but just a low risk. I really hope your right that the documented cases are lies. I would hate to find out that my life was ruined on a 1/10000 chance. I'll assume that you're right, but lets just say that my tests come back negative and I did contract HIV from oral sex, would my case be profound and worth investigation from experts? I feel like if its really that rare, it would be a huge deal in the HIV research community.
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
Interesting!
Yes, there are documented cases. However, the fact of the matter there is pretty undetermined, out of million people infected through out the globe over the period of time, handful of HIV contractions through oral itself is a subject of debate, which certainly has been the case in the past, present and most probably will be in the future unless, the "conservative" CDC doesn't wish to call "A spade - A SPADE".
I understand, you should be thinking that I am going round in circles, by now. I am going to make this simple - It's a theoretical risk and the reason oral sex is documented as a possible way of transmission because few people chose to lie about their exposure and the rest THOUGHT, that's how they contracted the virus, nevertheless penetrative vaginal, anal, sharing needles were also some thing they must have indulged in at some point but what they THOUGHT gave them the virus is oral sex and they let it be documented. Having said that, the percentage of the aforesaid people are minuscule and better off ignored.
Me, any other contributor to this forum or the doctors here would say it and say it pretty clearly - ORAL SEX IS NO RISK! Why? Because there is no transmission mechanism available. Consumption of semen is not an effective method of transmission, gastric acid in your stomach inhibits the virus. Saliva is not infectious, it contains several proteins that inhibits the virus. Relax! You're fine.
Now, let's talk about your doctor, that lady is either making money here or genuinely HIV know-how deprived, in either of the cases it's warranted to change your doctor and if ever you need a REAL insight on HIV, it has to be either an "Infectious disease doctor" or "STD/HIV specialist".
I am ruling out your questions here, not answering them because the crux from where it was generated is totally non existence.