You have had both T1 and T2 scans, when it says T1-weighted images & T2-weighted images that was the T1 &T2 scans. T1 and T2 lesions would have shown on those scans.
I agree with your radiologist, this it is an expensive test so the dye should have been used, when it was being done anyway.. Your question was not are T1 & T2 necessary, your question was is the dye necessary?
Here is a post that asked that...
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/Multiple-Sclerosis/confusion-over-contrast-and-no-contrast/show/798999
Also if you go to HP, the Health Pages you will see many helpful topics about lesions. A link to the Health Pages is in the upper right hand side of this page.
On the first HP page I can direct you to the first post *How lesions show in MS, & *Can a person have MS with a negative MRI and on the second HP page is *Lesions come & go. Those would be interesting to you.
The dye shows new or active lesions, without the dye it is not possible to determine if a lesion is active. But within about a day of becoming new or active, a corresponding T2 lesion will show without the dye. So your sagital scans...side view scan....should show lesions without the dye. But I agree with your radiologist, while you were getting the scan, the doc should have ordered the dye, just for efficiency. If your getting the scan., might as well collect all the information that can be collected.
I did read a post from a woman who had a lot of allergies to many substances and her doc did not order the dye, but it made sense. Although she had never had the dye, she would likely have been allergic to it & it didn't get so much information that it was worth a potential allergic reaction.
That's a quick response, check out the other post and the HP pages. And good luck with this.
Lynn