I'm very confused now and there's something wrong with your story.
If you had the test in the lab and if the test was reactive, then your doctor or staff had to do confirmatory tests to determine whether you are positive or not. At this stage you should already know if this was the case? What did your doctor said about the test results?
Each test is reactive to a certain level and you should not be confused with figures like 0.23 etc. since those small values are result of reactivity produced under laboratory conditions.
i don't know. The only thing i knew is i did not sex through anal and vagina 100%. only oral sex i have been experienced and mostly i am the receiver (somene giving blowjob on me). I am really worried now if i am at risk for hiv, now that my first screening was reactive. huhuhu!
If that's your only exposure within the past few months than I have no idea. Question: Was there any blood exposure from your partner?
i am really confused right now. Based in this website, a lot of comments and advices says that oral sex is no risk. its a really big question because i dont have anal and vaginal sex but only oral sex i'd just did and i never had any symptoms that related to hiv. Do you have any idea what is the cause of reactive in my first screening test?
This has to be a false positive for you hopefully. The risk for a woman receiving oral sex is nil
exactly, right now i am still waiting for the confirmatory result..im very worried now. Do you have any idea what is the cause of reactive in the first screening test?