Was this a blood test? If so blood tests are not reliable for active infections.
You had no risk for chlamydia.
Thank you. No, it was not blood test. It was an urethral exudate
And to add: I also thought I had no risk for this infection, but I had this "weak positive" result
This is why I'm so puzzled...
Never heard of a weak positive.
OK, the Dr. told that it could be a false positive, or a positive with the infection in recession or incipient. Got to retest and see.
I did a new test and it was negative. It doesn't mean that weak positive equals falst positive, but in this case it was.
In any case, I started the treatment, since I got the prescription prior to my second test. If I had a false positive, I could also have a false negative.
Yes I would say it was a false positive.
No false negative as it would mean the medication worked.